[citation][nom]luciferano[/nom]Graphics improvements are far less important than improving the get to where you need to go problem. Kudos for improving Apple, but you have a helluva long way to go and you're doing it the way that you and others accuse Android of doing, by using your sheep as guinea pigs.[/citation]
Do you have an iOS device by which to compare, or are you reading a couple of over-blown internet articles and making your own assertions? The one percent are the ones complaining, and even then the majority of what I've read has been trivial things, like showing a monument two hundred feet south-west of where it actually is - the usability of the app hasn't suffered for many, and if for some reason it had for you, you had plenty of options.
Apple doing this is akin to Microsoft no longer bundling Java with it's Operating Systems. And to be honest, from a business case, what sounds better: avoiding paying royalties on each and every of the tens of millions of the new product you're about to launch, or having a couple stories mock a stupid app you put out, knowing full well that it's not that big of a deal?
Plenty users, myself included, have had absolutely zero problems, and as some have pointed out if anything the maps load faster, because of the way they are rendered. If having a hiccup in an app makes you dislike a company or it's products THAT much, even when alternatives are offered, then hey, return your $600 rare smartphone. Somebody else will buy it.
BRB need to go be an Apple fanboy again. Because that's what I am, for having the Maps app work correctly, right?