znegval -
The direction the corporate world has taken: ditching "liabilities" like manufacturing plants and shifting into "branding". There are industrial psychologists who study brand imaging and how to get consumers to increase their brand loyaltly.
This is not to say that for many people that the iPad is not a good choice. However, there are people upset at what constitutes "news" for the Apple products. I don't recall seeing many years ago any articles on the power of a tablet PC using Corel Painter or ArtRage, yet when someone uses a dumbed-down app to fingerpaint on an Apple product is is headlines. Why?
Well, we know. People are obsessed with Apple. Tom's staffers have admitted that the Apple articles drive clicks, and clicks mean more ads served and greater revenue. As they have said, it is not a minor difference either. I believe it was at least an order of magnitude greater.
I have seen many good products drown out because of iMania. For example, do you think having an eReader with a plastic screen that wouldn't shatter would have a good use in the market? Say, perhaps as a substitute for heavy books used used in an academic environment (k-12 or college)? PlasticLogic had such a device, but under the media mania of the iPad they withdrew it. Now we do not have an eReader with a plastic display that was flexible, a device that you could step on and still have it function - whereas most devices if you stomp a boot on it will have a busted screen.
Branding alone does not drive all products, but there are many products that succeed by branding. Again, another example: The Coca-cola paradox. When doing a blind test, people often picked Pepsi as the better of the two products. However, when the brand was shown then people chose Coca-cola. Why would people in a blind test say they liked Pepsi, but in a non-blind test say they like Coke? Branding, brand loyalty, and the way it makes them feel.
You cannot tell me that there is not an "image" that Apple pushes for its products. Old, nerdy, and somewhat incompetent suit versus a sassy, young, and edgy hipster sound familiar? "It just works" is another aspect of their brand, even though there are those who show their products still have warts.
Yes, people want to use it - but do they want to use it because they looked at product capabilities for the cost and said it was good, or do they want it to fulfill some psychological or social need brought about by a marketing department? For some, the former is true - for others, the latter. It is the latter we concern ourselves with.