AT&T Tests LTE Network ''Real World'' 4G Speeds

[Marcus Yam]

Hit your data caps faster than ever!

AT&T Tests LTE Network ''Real World'' 4G Speeds : Read more

 

[burnley14]

Sucks to be me, that's way faster than my landline DSL speed. I need to get a new provider

 

[j3ff86]

Use up your 200mb or 2gb cap even quicker!

 

[rpgplayer]

so with this you'll be over your cap in the first two days instead of the first 4 days...

 

[JOSHSKORN]

Sadly, I'm sure 95% of users aren't intelligent enough to switch to "Wi-Fi" whenever they can. Oh well, the phone companies will win on that one.

 

[phatboe]

"Verizon advertises LTE speeds of 5-12 Mbps download and 5 Mbps upload."

Quick question, this advertised bandwidth of 5-12Mbps is this shared bandwidth or dedicated? If it is shared how is it shared?

 

[wishmaster12]

Almost as good as Skater bashing!

 

[memadmax]

But does it play crysis?

 

[joytech22]

The embarrassing thing about this is that their wireless is still faster than 80% of what all of Australia gets from wired connections..

 

[Guest]

great now we can communicate faster at the cost of eating food and the effect they have on bees.

 

[Guest]

Verizon's 4G sucks. It may be fast, but they "data manage" their network by funneling through a Proxy in LA, California. Fast doesn't cut it. You will have crappy pings and unreliable web surfing if you tether. Plus remember that you will being charged a small fortune.

 

[mannypraz]

Att wins, as usual, still have UN PLAN from Cingular and have unlimited Internet package, text etc $90 with tax and will never go up

 

[mcd023]

yea, the fastest land connection i can get is 5Mbps down...

 

[Guest]

I've seen speed tests on Verizon LTE phones that are almost identical. That doesn't mean that once the network becomes saturated Verizon or AT&T are going to get anywhere near that.

 

[scuba dave]

Oh lord I can't wait til they impliment.. And I get a compatible phone.. That is faster than my cable at home Which, is embarrassing, tbh.. But then again.. We all know the cable companies are crap. Slightly off topic.. I'm surprised I haven't heard one AT&T sucks comment.. Maybe there is hope for Apple too? Nevermind.. prolly not ;P

 

[daniel123244]

[citation][nom]burnley14[/nom]Sucks to be me, that's way faster than my landline DSL speed. I need to get a new provider[/citation]

in ontario i currently have 3mbps down/1mbps up lol

 

[daniel123244]

[citation][nom]burnley14[/nom]Sucks to be me, that's way faster than my landline DSL speed. I need to get a new provider[/citation]

in ontario i currently have 3mbps down/1mbps up lol

 

[ikefu]

Woot for rural Wyoming Bresnan Cable and 30 mbps internet! At least I can say my home internet is faster.

Now, you know when AT&T deploys all of two towers in New York City that you aren't going to get anywhere near the lab test speeds posted here. Crowded cities and lost/repeated packets are going to cut way down on that.

I think Verizon has it right in posting advertised speeds more likely to be what you will really see.

 

[Guest]

Yea, Downs/Ups matter but latency is what's more important to me

 

[paulthepwner]

[citation][nom]JOSHSKORN[/nom]Sadly, I'm sure 95% of users aren't intelligent enough to switch to "Wi-Fi" whenever they can. Oh well, the phone companies will win on that one.[/citation]

I have a T-1 at work, where I spend most of my time. I get 4 mbps down and 2 up with HSPA.

Why would I want to use wifi?