Boots Recharge Gadgets With Thermoelectricity

Status
Not open for further replies.

decepticon

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2008
66
0
18,580
This probably would not work well in very hot climates as the temp difference between the ground and your feet wouldn't be that much.
 

N.Broekhuijsen

Distinguished
Jun 17, 2009
292
0
18,940
now put it into something I wear more often than these boots. these boots are not used for long trips, and that is when you need this kind of technology.
 

anamaniac

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2009
1,035
0
19,230
[citation][nom]dextermat[/nom]Nice:This could be one step forward recycling wasted heat from computer!!!!Of course the technology need to be developed[/citation]
In Canada, it's not waste heat. ^_^

Honestly, these are laughable...
 

lashabane

Distinguished
Oct 7, 2009
78
0
18,580
[citation][nom]sliem[/nom]Gasp, cute. Ehm. Not safe for work.[/citation]

NSFW? Do you work in a monastery? Is a Nun peeking over your shoulder?
 

nforce4max

Distinguished
Sep 9, 2009
516
0
18,960
This wouldn't do me much good when I am walking home from school when I can feel the heat through my boots. Also these boots wouldn't last long any ways for casual use much less getting from A to B. Plus they're out of place in most settings, I wonder how long before one gets trench foot by wearing these?
 

maestintaolius

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2009
446
0
18,930
Whoever designed these must have slept through thermo (or plans on selling them to people who never took it or also slept through it). If one was to take this device and replace it with the ideal Carnot engine (the mythical highest efficiency heat engine possible) and assuming a 20°F difference in temperature of the ground surface and the boot you'd have an device of about 4% efficiency (real is likely to be less - usually far less). Without knowing the exact construction of the device, you can't know exactly how much energy is available (it depends on things like thickness, area, thermal resistivity of the entire device, etc) but when I read the company's site, I see Seebeck effect, p- n-type semiconductors, thermopile, etc; I just see a marketing gimmick using technical words to convince people, "it can't be fake, it sounds too scientific!" Of course, they missed the obvious marketing line of "employing the same technology that has kept the Voyager spacecraft powered for 20 years" (granted, the Voyager craft uses nuclear decay as a heat source and space as the heat sink so there's considerably larger thermal gradient).

The only way this device has even the remotest chance of working is if the thermopile device has incredibly low thermal resistivity and is very thin (which would end up feeling like you have a hole in your boot - i.e. not compatible with MN winters). Reading further through their website you also see the statement that basically says "12 hours of wear for 1 hour of charge time" leads me to believe you'd be better off buying a little hand crank generator to charge your phone.
 

maestintaolius

Distinguished
Jul 16, 2009
446
0
18,930
[citation][nom]BPT747[/nom]I want to see this technology they are using, if it is feasible then I can design a product that is usefull.[/citation]
The technology isn't actually all that complicated, just do a quick google of Seebeck effect (it's what makes thermocouples work) or RTGs (it's what they use to power deep space probes that can't use solar) and it will explain it all. The reverse (applying power to thermocouple type junctions) can actually be used to cool devices and is referred to as the Peltier effect which is also an interesting read.
 
G

Guest

Guest
such a thing is already active in the army for many years, they power their infra red cams and nightvision with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.