Canon Lens for DSLR

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On Mon, 02 May 2005 17:00:30 -0700, Stefan Patric
<writeme@addressbelow.com> wrote:

>On Monday 02 May 2005 07:58, Alan Browne wrote:
>
>> DelphiCoder wrote:
>>
>>> "Stefan Patric" <writeme@addressbelow.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2xhde.10104$_K.5452@fed1read03...
>>>
>>>> What are you planning on photographing at those speeds? Bullets in
>>>> flight?
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, I did want to try that.
>>
>> The shutter speed has nothing to do with it. Even at 1/8,000, a high
>> powered bullet (3000 fps) will travel over 4 inches over that time. A
>> more common speed bullet will travel 1.5 inches.
>
>Okay. Bullets are out. All the shooting required to calibrate
>everything would probably scare the hell of neighbors anyway. But how
>far would a starship traveling at, say, Warp 3 go in 1/8000 sec?
>Inquiring minds want to know. ;-)
>
>> Further, don't forget that at high shutter speeds a "slit" is
>> travelling across the frame.
>
>Actually, with these types of high speed shutters, the slit travels
>vertically from the bottom of the frame (the top of the picture. It's
>upside down, remember.) to the top.
>
>> You need a specialty strobe with high power and very short cycle at a
>> high ISO.
>
>Yes, a special strobe, but it doesn't need to recycle fast. It just
>must have a very, and I mean VERY, short flash duration like on the
>order of one millionth of a second.

Most highspeed photography now doesn't depend on the strobe
speed of a light. I've seen it. The light comes on for a couple
seconds, the speed of the camera is accomplished by a ultra high
speed motor spinning a cylindrical mirror (polygonal?) that provides
the "strobe" across a film plane. It's used in conjunction with a
shutter.
If you want to capture a bullet in flight and aren't interested
in things like capturing a supersonic shock wave, you can detune the
bullet speed by reducing the powder charge. Some .45 cal. ammo fps is
well under 1000.
-Rich
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

On Mon, 02 May 2005 17:00:30 -0700, Stefan Patric <writeme@addressbelow.com> wrote:

>On Monday 02 May 2005 07:58, Alan Browne wrote:
>
>> DelphiCoder wrote:
>>

>Okay. Bullets are out. All the shooting required to calibrate
>everything would probably scare the hell of neighbors anyway. But how
>far would a starship traveling at, say, Warp 3 go in 1/8000 sec?
>Inquiring minds want to know. ;-)
>

Well, it would actually depend on which generation of Star Trek you used.

Light speed = 299,792,458 meters per second

Okay below is a chart depicting the number of times light speed you would be traveling at each warp speed. Broken down to the various episodes, as in the
Original Star Trek the technology was not as good.






Warp Speed Comparison Chart
Warp Factor Number Of Times The Speed Of Light
ST ST- TNG/DS9/VOY
1 1 1
2 8 10
3 27 39
4 64 102
5 125 215
6 216 392
7 343 656
8 512 1,024
9 729 1,516
9.2 779 1,649
9.6 885 1,909
9.9 970 3,053
9.99 997 7,912
10 1,000 <INFINITE>
TRANSWARP
11 1,331
12 1,728
13 2,197
14 2,744
15 3,375
16 4,096
17 4,913
18 5,832
19 6,859
20 8,000
21 <INFINITE>
TRANSWARP



so therefore at warp 3 in the ORIGINAL ST you would be traveling at 8,094,396,366 meters per second, so in 1/8000 of a second your star ship would have moved
1,011,799.54575 meters or 628.7 miles thereby taking you well beyond the range of any standard camera lens you could hold in your two hands.

HOWEVER at warp 3 in the Next Generation Star Trek series you would be traveling at 11,691,905,862 meters per second, so in 1/8000 of a second your star ship
would have moved 1,461,488.23275 meters or 908.13 miles.

In my opinion using either system would not show anything on film even if you managed to get your shutter open while the ship was in frame, it might just
decrease your available light by a little bit and give a decent picture of what ever was in front of your camera.



(these number were taken from the following locations...so if they are wrong, blame someone else...)
warp speeds - http://www.star-fleet.com/ed/warp-chart.html
light speed - http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/guidry/violence/lightspeed.html
mathematical conversions - http://www.easysurf.cc/cnvert.htm#memi2
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

callme annie wrote:

> Original Star Trek the technology was not as good.

It still isn't.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (More info?)

james <fishbowl@conservatory.com> wrote:

> A heck of a lot of my photos are going to be Arizona landscapes, taken
> at midday, in the summer.

Midday is the worst time to take Arizona landscapes, incidentally.

> I'm pretty sure fast shutters will be useful to me.

You'll probably be using small apertures anyway.

--
Jeremy | jeremy@exit109.com