This article starts out by stating that it's not all about looks and colours, then in a way proves it is with the majority of the articles discussed.
It's all fine and dandy to want a "life style printer" that fits nicely with the couch instead of one that's chosen merely on specs; until you want to get some real work done, you have a deadline and a shitload of other things to do. Pink might be enough for girlies, but grown women need to get work done more so than just playing with gadgets.
The real secret of winning over people, is making intuitive products, where functionality doesn't get in the way of getting the job done; yet allowing more complex things if so required. It doesn't have much to do with male or female, rather with the mindset and focus of the person in that situation, and not getting in the way of his/her activities or indeed life itself.
For instance, I'm a decent photographer. Sometimes I like to do highly technical shots that take a lot of time to prepare. But sometimes, I would also just like to point-and-shoot without fiddling any buttons and get on with the party. If products would be designed in such a way they can handle these two extremes well, they would appeal to the largest group of people – either male or female.
I'm not an Apple fan, but they seem to attract a lot of less technical people – and yes, women – with their stylish and intuitive products; so I guess Apple understands this fine line between usability and functionality.