FA: T720i cameraphone plus tons of extras ends soon

[David]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Scott Stephenson" <scott.stephensonson@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:4MudneWVW7AFlZbcRVn-gw@adelphia.com...
>
> "Steven J Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
> news:mtCdnYKzHML9SpfcRVn-qw@lmi.net...
> > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Michael 65 <michael@nomail.com> wrote:
> > > I think all of this as funny! I get a good laugh...;-)
> >
> > Oh, you just think it's funny because you haven't had to deal with him
> yet.
> >
> > He's been singing Cingular's praises lately, and extolling the virtues
of
> > his wonderful new Motorola V600, so I bet you will be hearing a lot from
> him.
> >
> >
>
> I can picture him and his phone- obsessively polishing it every night,
> giggling every time he sees the Cingular banner come up.
>
>
We will have to see what he has to say when he calls CS and tries to sort
out data comms.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <RM123-C70C53.01515231072004
@news03.east.earthlink.net>, RobertRM123@faq.cIty says...
> But somehow these apologists think insulting me somehow, shape or way
> makes SprintPCS better.
>

I'm sorry to hear that you're so hurt by the labels you've
earned. You're called a liar because, quite bluntly, you
lie. About the posts made to you, about what they say, and
about who it is that wishes to be "in charge" of the
newsgroup.

Your first Cingular "FAQ" should be a laugh riot.

--
RØß
O/Siris
-+-
**A thing moderately good is not so good as it
ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a
virtue, but moderation in principle is always a
vice.**
-Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. 1792-

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <RM123-C70C53.01515231072004@news03.east.earthlink.net> on Sat, 31 Jul 2004
06:51:51 GMT, Robert <RM123@faq.cIty> wrote:

>In article <SMWdnUEsa774JpfcRVn-jg@lmi.net>,
> Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>
>> nonsense

>Sobol is one of the blind Sprint apologists

Ad hominem. Childish.

>who whenever some writes to
>the SprintPCS newsgroup about one of the biodegradable Sprint phones

Silly. And childish.

>or
>how Sprint messed up billing, instead of offering help, makes the poster
>the issue.

In many cases the poster *is* the issue.

>And there are lots of such postings, for afterall,
>repeatedly, year after year, 2002, 2003, 2004;
>SprintPCS is rated worst (bottom of the list) for Customer Service by
>
>J.D. Power,
>
>Consumer Reports
>
>The Yankee Group
>
>in scientifically conducted surveys of thousands of cellular users.

Citations to back that up? Even one? Or just more smoke.

>But somehow these apologists think insulting me somehow, shape or way
>makes SprintPCS better.

But it's OK when you insult them? Cute. Not.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <rm123-DFB1FD.14460730072004@news04.east.earthlink.net> on Fri, 30 Jul 2004
19:46:07 GMT, RøbertM <rm123@faq.cIty> wrote:

>In article <8AMUSK4Z38198.6352546296@anonymous.poster>,
> RogerClemons@theball.park a Sprint troller wrote:
>
>Nonsense,, you're just a TROLL leftover from trying to apologize for the
>loser SprintPCS,which annually gets rated worst in customer service by
>
>J.D. Power
>Consumer Reports
>Yankee Group

Mobile Service Popularity Contest
<http/www.clickz.com/stats/markets/wireless/article.php/1469071>

Every mobile phone user has a different experience since variables
such as equipment, location, and service impact every single call.
However, there are some wireless carriers that satisfy customers and
perform better than others in the United States, and Yankee Group has
analyzed the ratings of the big players in the market.

Using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the lowest level of
satisfaction and 5 indicates the highest, the carrier average was
4.23 with 48 percent (compared with 42 percent in 2000) of
respondents describing themselves as "very satisfied" with their
service.

...

At the lowest end of the satisfaction spectrum was ALLTEL with a 4.07
score and only 37 percent describing themselves as "very satisfied."
ALLTEL also showed the lowest performance score with 3.76.

...

Cingular landed right below Verizon with 4.28 but ranked higher in
satisfying customers at 51 percent. Cingular's overall performance
scored 3.83.

Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
very satisfied customers. Yankee Group notes that Sprint PCS lost
some ground from the 2000 survey results, where it ranked as the
clear winner. In 2002, Sprint PCS ranked above average for most
performance metrics and wound up with an overall performance score of
3.91.

In other words, more unfounded smoke.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Robert]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <QVGPc.5324$54.88038@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> >SprintPCS is rated worst (bottom of the list) for Customer Service by
> >
> >J.D. Power,
> >
> >Consumer Reports
> >
> >The Yankee Group
> >
> >in scientifically conducted surveys of thousands of cellular users.
>
> Citations to back that up? Even one? Or just more smoke.

Sorry NAVAS is to lazy to go to the website of each of those.
That the cellular "expert" is unaware of the rankings is typical of his
overbearing pretense at expertise.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <RM143-E5F46B.02413103082004@news03.east.earthlink.net> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
07:41:31 GMT, Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:

>In article <QVGPc.5324$54.88038@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> >SprintPCS is rated worst (bottom of the list) for Customer Service by
>> >
>> >J.D. Power,
>> >
>> >Consumer Reports
>> >
>> >The Yankee Group
>> >
>> >in scientifically conducted surveys of thousands of cellular users.
>>
>> Citations to back that up? Even one? Or just more smoke.
>
>Sorry NAVAS is to lazy to go to the website of each of those.
>That the cellular "expert" is unaware of the rankings is typical of his
>overbearing pretense at expertise.

From my earlier post:

Mobile Service Popularity Contest
<http/www.clickz.com/stats/markets/wireless/article.php/1469071>

Every mobile phone user has a different experience since variables
such as equipment, location, and service impact every single call.
However, there are some wireless carriers that satisfy customers and
perform better than others in the United States, and Yankee Group has
analyzed the ratings of the big players in the market.

Using a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates the lowest level of
satisfaction and 5 indicates the highest, the carrier average was
4.23 with 48 percent (compared with 42 percent in 2000) of
respondents describing themselves as "very satisfied" with their
service.

...

At the lowest end of the satisfaction spectrum was ALLTEL with a 4.07
score and only 37 percent describing themselves as "very satisfied."
ALLTEL also showed the lowest performance score with 3.76.

...

Cingular landed right below Verizon with 4.28 but ranked higher in
satisfying customers at 51 percent. Cingular's overall performance
scored 3.83.

Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
very satisfied customers. Yankee Group notes that Sprint PCS lost
some ground from the 2000 survey results, where it ranked as the
clear winner. In 2002, Sprint PCS ranked above average for most
performance metrics and wound up with an overall performance score of
3.91.

Your turn. ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Robert]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
> very satisfied customers


That is something to be proud of?

So you do know the truth, then why ask for URLs. You are such a phoney,
Mr. NAVAS.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <RM143-971BE3.02444703082004@news03.east.earthlink.net> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
07:44:47 GMT, Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:

>In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
>> very satisfied customers
>
>That is something to be proud of?

It wasn't bad, but the real point is that it shows your claims to be false.

>So you do know the truth, then why ask for URLs.

To show that your claims are false.

>You are such a phoney,
>Mr. NAVAS.

Being found out seems to really upset you. You can avoid such embarrassment
in the future by not just making things up.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:
> In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
>> very satisfied customers
>
>
> That is something to be proud of?

No one was saying it's something to be proud of. I think the point is
that Sprint is not last, as you love to claim.


--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http/JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

 

[Robert]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <pYOdncwmz7ZQLZLcRVn-hQ@lmi.net>,
Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:

> In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:
> > In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
> >> very satisfied customers
> >
> >
> > That is something to be proud of?
>
> No one was saying it's something to be proud of. I think the point is
> that Sprint is not last, as you love to claim.

Sprint was last.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <RM143-058DF4.11310503082004@news04.east.earthlink.net> on Tue, 03 Aug 2004
16:31:05 GMT, Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:

>In article <pYOdncwmz7ZQLZLcRVn-hQ@lmi.net>,
> Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>
>> In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:
>> > In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
>> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
>> >> very satisfied customers
>> >
>> >
>> > That is something to be proud of?
>>
>> No one was saying it's something to be proud of. I think the point is
>> that Sprint is not last, as you love to claim.
>
>Sprint was last.

Nope. No matter how many times you repeat it.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http/navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular,alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Robert" <RM143@ret.com> wrote in message
news:RM143-058DF4.11310503082004@news04.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <pYOdncwmz7ZQLZLcRVn-hQ@lmi.net>,
> Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>
> > In alt.cellular.sprintpcs Robert <RM143@ret.com> wrote:
> > > In article <Y8HPc.5325$54.88135@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> > > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sprint PCS was not far behind with a score of 4.27 and 48 percent of
> > >> very satisfied customers
> > >
> > >
> > > That is something to be proud of?
> >
> > No one was saying it's something to be proud of. I think the point is
> > that Sprint is not last, as you love to claim.
>
> Sprint was last.

If you continue to repeat this lie 50 times ... it will still be a lie
Phillipe ... even if you post it under 10 more different IDs.

Bob