Gadgets We've Loved, Spurned, and Lead On

Status
Not open for further replies.
The standard Bagel Drive is 1 giganosh. Some of the review drives were of smaller capacity. When it comes to serving the public, Bupkes Bakery doesn't cut corners. There are no corners on a bagel.

Irv Bupkes
http://bupkesbakery.com
 
Thanks, Irv. Speaking of corners, have you considered going into production with a "Gigatash" rather than a "Giganosh?" I'd love to see a Bupkes Hamentash Drive.

 
"With only 512GB (sic) of storage, it hardly earns the space it takes up in my bag (it is at least 3 inches in diameter)."

Ha ha ha, how much did you pay for the "512GB" bagel?
 
Actually, I'm working on a matzoh ball drive and I'd like to do a rugelah drive or some kind of cookie drives. Matzoh ball is tricky material. It has to be preserved differently (ie, freeze-dried) and modified differently. A hamentash drive would be wonderful, but like with the rugelah drive crumbly doughs are difficult to make into something that looks fresh and is tough enough to last. If it comes out looking like plastic, what's the point?

I'll work on it for you, Rachel. Not for this year, but given time to experiment by next year I'll have a hamentash drive for you. Do you want poppy, prune or apricot? With poppy seed I could do something.
 
[citation][nom]irvbupkes[/nom]Actually, I'm working on a matzoh ball drive and I'd like to do a rugelah drive or some kind of cookie drives. Matzoh ball is tricky material. It has to be preserved differently (ie, freeze-dried) and modified differently. A hamentash drive would be wonderful, but like with the rugelah drive crumbly doughs are difficult to make into something that looks fresh and is tough enough to last. If it comes out looking like plastic, what's the point?I'll work on it for you, Rachel. Not for this year, but given time to experiment by next year I'll have a hamentash drive for you. Do you want poppy, prune or apricot? With poppy seed I could do something.[/citation]
I'll wait forever for my apricot Giga-tash!
 
concept of "shuffle" was new

This chick is a moron. Shuffle as a concept is as old as a juke box, and wasn't anything "new" in 2002.

We had a good run--perhaps two and a half years.

Funny, my Creative Nomad which I got in 2002 works great 7 years later.
 
[citation][nom]anon121231344[/nom]This chick is a moron. Shuffle as a concept is as old as a juke box, and wasn't anything "new" in 2002.Funny, my Creative Nomad which I got in 2002 works great 7 years later.[/citation]
Hey Anon,
Thanks for your comment. In 2002, the concept of shuffle was "new, to me, in the form of a portable music player." Is that better? As for longevity, no doubt that iPods don't last as long as some other players.

Rachel Rosmarin
Editor of Tom's Guide
 
This was a fun read...despite having to stomach an excess of apple products (what can I say, I'm not into paying $5 for starbucks coffee either...which has proven inferior to McDonalds coffee in taste tests...) while its not a fair nor universally true statement I can't help but see most people loaded to the gills with apple products as burying their insecurities with status symbols.

Most gadgets seem to be a pretty big waste of money to me.

That said I love my panasonic lumix tz5 camera and Sandisk sansa e260. And have a ti-89 calculator.

They take care of everything I would do away from an actual computer. Any other gadget I've encountered either

1)Isn't reliable
2)Is too expensive
3)Is a pita to use
4)Sacrifices too much preformance


Example:
I've got a fancy phone, sure it can do a lot of stuff...but I don't care what phone you have. Even with a full keypad surfing the net, sending email, watching videos, playing music etc. is pretty weak compared to using a real computer, or a good media player like my sansa...which has MUCH greater battery life than my phone could ever dream of in continual use. Since most of us have a computer at home, and work or access to a computer lab at least...why subject yourself to excess headache for the sake of cute novelties that are ultimately poor substitutes.

To each their own obviously and early adopters like Rachel fund these things so that eventually they become useful and cost effective or are pushed aside by items with real functionality.

Like the plethora of devices over the years to do DVR or interface your computer with your TV and stereo...when all you have to do is get another PC and...network it...I've done that since 1997...and its only gotten easier.

I often feel some people are just in love with the "idea" of being able to write an email from anywhere, etc...practical or not.
 
And I thought I was the only one who got attached to my gadgets! Great article, I know exactly where you're coming from.

I fell for my Asus G2P as soon as I saw it. It's served me well for almost 2 years.
 
[citation][nom]solymnar[/nom]This was a fun read...despite having to stomach an excess of apple products (what can I say, I'm not into paying $5 for starbucks coffee either...which has proven inferior to McDonalds coffee in taste tests...) while its not a fair nor universally true statement I can't help but see most people loaded to the gills with apple products as burying their insecurities with status symbols.Most gadgets seem to be a pretty big waste of money to me. That said I love my panasonic lumix tz5 camera and Sandisk sansa e260. And have a ti-89 calculator. They take care of everything I would do away from an actual computer. Any other gadget I've encountered either1)Isn't reliable2)Is too expensive3)Is a pita to use4)Sacrifices too much preformanceExample:I've got a fancy phone, sure it can do a lot of stuff...but I don't care what phone you have. Even with a full keypad surfing the net, sending email, watching videos, playing music etc. is pretty weak compared to using a real computer, or a good media player like my sansa...which has MUCH greater battery life than my phone could ever dream of in continual use. Since most of us have a computer at home, and work or access to a computer lab at least...why subject yourself to excess headache for the sake of cute novelties that are ultimately poor substitutes.To each their own obviously and early adopters like Rachel fund these things so that eventually they become useful and cost effective or are pushed aside by items with real functionality. Like the plethora of devices over the years to do DVR or interface your computer with your TV and stereo...when all you have to do is get another PC and...network it...I've done that since 1997...and its only gotten easier.I often feel some people are just in love with the "idea" of being able to write an email from anywhere, etc...practical or not.[/citation]
Solymnar,
You make a very good point. For example--the Treo 650--clearly it was a rudimentary, early product, in retrospect. But I bought it, thus...sort of...paving the way for the smart phone market that eventually led to better Blackberrys and iPhones. However, at the time, the Treo felt necessary to me--I would have had a hard time giving it up. Even though it (and my iPhone, too) didn't replace a real computing experience, it afforded me a convenience that I cherish to this day. Every one of these gadgets that I wrote about (with the exception of the BagelDrive and the Roomba) and extremely practical to my life.

Rachel
 
My first GPS, a Garmin Streetpilot c340. I loved her and her British (Emily) accent from day 1. It was one of those technological breakthroughs that come around once every 20 years, the kind that you can genuinely say that it's the best $400 you ever spent.

But as time went on, I noticed her teenie flaws, missing an exit here, being late on an announcement there. Taking forever to search through its database of POI's. She just wasn't sensitive enough anymore. I upgraded to a hotter, slimmer blonde model, the Nuvi 760 but she just doesn't excite me like the c340 did.
 
[citation][nom]jwl3[/nom]My first GPS, a Garmin Streetpilot c340. I loved her and her British (Emily) accent from day 1. It was one of those technological breakthroughs that come around once every 20 years, the kind that you can genuinely say that it's the best $400 you ever spent.But as time went on, I noticed her teenie flaws, missing an exit here, being late on an announcement there. Taking forever to search through its database of POI's. She just wasn't sensitive enough anymore. I upgraded to a hotter, slimmer blonde model, the Nuvi 760 but she just doesn't excite me like the c340 did.[/citation]
What's the new one's name? I don't have a text-to-speech GPS personally, but I've noticed that everyone who has one calls it by name (either by the name of the accent in the manual, or a made up name).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.