Good Camera for PPC...?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

Looking around a little, it appears 1.3 megapixels is the best that you can
get in a SD camera attachment for a iPaq. Of those, users of the one from
HP seem very disappointed. Any recommendations for a better model from
another manufacturer?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

"chaznet" <remove_benjimen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uzrUZTHFFHA.3824@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Looking around a little, it appears 1.3 megapixels is the best that you
> can get in a SD camera attachment for a iPaq. Of those, users of the one
> from HP seem very disappointed. Any recommendations for a better model
> from another manufacturer?

http/www.to-tech.com/mobileviews/merlin/reviews/cfcameras.htm

But, unless you want the camera to be a "glad I had it handy thing" then, I
would at least consider a separate camera...

The cameras on a card tend to be underfeatured, poorly light sensitive, and
severely lacking on storage in most cases (Exception to the last point would
be if you had both SD and CF storage, etc. ).

Unless you have an application that requires a camera on the PPC (such as
teleconference) or you just want it to be an inclusive unit. No accounting
for personal taste or custom applications, of course.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

I've been reasonably impressed by the Veo 130S SD camera (1.3 megapixels).
You can find my comparison of it with other PPC camera cards and some camera
phones at...

http/to-tech.com/mobileviews/merlin/reviews/cfcameras.htm
--
Todd Ogasawara, MS-MVP/Mobile Devices
Online Editor - http/MobileViews.com/ -- PDA & Wireless Info
http/www.OgasaWalrus.com/MobileDot/ - Brief News & Comments

"chaznet" <remove_benjimen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uzrUZTHFFHA.3824@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Looking around a little, it appears 1.3 megapixels is the best that you
> can get in a SD camera attachment for a iPaq. Of those, users of the one
> from HP seem very disappointed. Any recommendations for a better model
> from another manufacturer?
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (More info?)

Yeah like Todd said, the Veo is decent enough (though poor in low
light). I did a review for Aximsite last year :
http/www.aximsite.com/reviews/index.php?qid=188&catid=25

Cheers - Neil

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:14:06 -0800, "chaznet"
<remove_benjimen@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Looking around a little, it appears 1.3 megapixels is the best that you can
>get in a SD camera attachment for a iPaq. Of those, users of the one from
>HP seem very disappointed. Any recommendations for a better model from
>another manufacturer?
>