News It’s shockingly easy to make offensive AI images with the Pixel 9 — and that’s a problem

[admin]

Pixel 9 comes with an AI image generator built in, but Pixel Studio makes it far too easy to produce offensive AI images.

It’s shockingly easy to make offensive AI images with the Pixel 9 — and that’s a problem : Read more

 

[Istolla]

Arguing against freedom of speech is weird. Your argument should focus more on consequence of speech rather than taking it away.

 

[VBerg]

You mean it does what you ask of it and treats you like an adult?

Censorship is telling a man he can't eat steak because a baby can't chew it.

 

[Joeyj0j0]

Good lord, the pearl-clutching… You know what else can be used to create offensive images? A pencil.

BURN THEM ALL!!!

 

[Arkitekt78]

Poor little fella...

this article is just a pitiful display of everything wrong with the world today. We can't just be adults and deal with things, we must ban all that even has the potential to offend.
Grow up.

 

[censorship_sucks]

Ok ,Tom... We can find somebody to hold your hand. I would hate for you to see an image that you object to.

The rest of us will decide which content is suitable for us on our own.

This News outlet, now pushing censorship and restriction on art, expression, and liberty, is no longer useful.

 

[David's]

It's seriously a problem that you think everything needs to be censored to protect everyone's snowflake feelings. It's an ai image generator and it should be about to make anything i want it to make with a prompt, the more it's limited the worse it is.

I i want anyone playing basketball, and it refuses to give me this because anyone might offend some people that's immediately an uninstall and/or never use this ai again.

 

[JSBinSLC]

So glad that all the commenters (so far) grasp what the original article writer cannot. It is the user of the tool that is responsible for what the tool creates and publishes and promotes, not the tool. And that is who should be held responsible here. If we don't want users creating certain things, then we should punish them, not the tool.

Furthermore, there are legitimate reasons why one might need to depict nazis or confederate soldiers, or any number of other things.

 

[USAFRet]

It is interesting that all (except for 1) of the naysayers of the content of this article are brand new accounts, registered in the last 24 hours.

Not agreeing or disagreeing....just 'interesting'.

 

[censorship_sucks]

It is interesting that all (except for 1) of the naysayers of the content of this article are brand new accounts, registered in the last 24 hours.

Not agreeing or disagreeing....just 'interesting'.

I usually see garbage articles like this and ignore them. However, this time I felt like I had to say something. True, I didn't have an account, so I quickly created one. I'm assume the same is true for the others.

Speaking of interesting... interesting how you don't comment on obvious censorship, yet you find time to point out our new accounts. Your stance is obvious.. are you really former military? Former military that I know would have said " these new guys have a great point!"

 

[censorship_sucks]

I usually see garbage articles like this and ignore them. However, this time I felt like I had to say something. True, I didn't have an account, so I quickly created one. I'm assume the same is true for the others.

Speaking of interesting... interesting how you don't comment on obvious censorship, yet you find time to point out our new accounts. Your stance is obvious.. are you really former military? Former military that I know would have said " these new guys have a great point!"

In retrospect, I shouldn't have called out your military service. Assuming you are former military, I actually really do appreciate your time and efforts.