It's the World’s Largest Projected Capacitive Display

Status
Not open for further replies.

Prince_Porter

Distinguished
Mar 7, 2009
39
0
18,580
0
I'd love one of these in place of a much needed whiteboard. It would be great for project planning, and it's massive, which just makes it that much cooler.
 

zybch

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2010
217
0
18,830
0
[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]
I just moved from 24" to 27" screens with the same 1080HD resolution and the increase in pixel pitch was immediately noticeable and now I get distracted by the graininess unless I sit further back (which completely negates the larger display area anyway).
For a massive 82" display designed to be used at touch distance the resolution is just awful.
 

doorspawn

Distinguished
Feb 10, 2010
65
0
18,580
0
Agree with most of the above - that resolution is pathetic.
Standing that close, letters will probably be larger than 5mm (for capitals) with lots of aliasing.
It might be good for 3D movies in large rooms, but definitely not for standing next to.
 

Assmar

Distinguished
Sep 14, 2009
130
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]
So true, god only knows that my arms length is not the proper viewing distance for a 82" 1080p display.
 

digiex

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2009
232
0
18,830
0
@spammer, your spam would be very visible in LCD display that measures 82-inches diagonally and 6-inches deep, and salted as the "world's largest."

So post it there, not here!
 

K-zon

Distinguished
Apr 17, 2010
179
0
18,630
0
Well, to say either way for the size in some say "retro-spect" the distances might be farther away. for the resolutions, otherwise, getting something like almost 10k by 10k, would be the idea.

But some thoughts would say probably need a screen in that size even for lower. Suggesting the 1920 x 1080.
 

jacobdrj

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
490
0
18,930
1
Yeah, that is not a good resolution in this case. It does give them that title 'World's Biggest', but unfortunately, that may apply to the pixels too...

This should be 2600x1600. At LEAST.
 

jacobdrj

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
490
0
18,930
1
[citation][nom]ionut19[/nom]4000x2250. That might work on a 16:9 wide screen this large, but don't know, would that be enough?[/citation]
Yes. That would reduce the pixel size by a factor of 4x4.
 

bv90andy

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2009
391
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]Pyree[/nom]Can it do better than 1080p. I did some calculation, if it can only do 1080p, that means each physical pixel is about 0.95mm. That is huge![/citation]

and you have to stay close when working with it. 1mm pixels from 1/2 meter away? The only way I would accept that is for playing original Mario.

This is just wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Streaming Video & TVs 16
Z Streaming Video & TVs 12
Z Streaming Video & TVs 24
G Streaming Video & TVs 28
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 10
G Streaming Video & TVs 6
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 33
G Streaming Video & TVs 21
F Streaming Video & TVs 5
tuanmai Streaming Video & TVs 19
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 22
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 49
G Streaming Video & TVs 27
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 21
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 15
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
G Streaming Video & TVs 0
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 74
G Streaming Video & TVs 1

ASK THE COMMUNITY