ReggieRay. These are the type of comments that give the USA a bad rep around the world. Can't support a decent guy as President because you don't like his colour and spread mistrust about people of other religions.
As for the camera. If NASA say it's theirs and they didn't give it to Edgar Mitchell, then it's theirs.
[citation][nom]doive1231[/nom]As for the camera. If NASA say it's theirs and they didn't give it to Edgar Mitchell, then it's theirs.[/citation]
Those are my shoes! I don't remember giving them to you! Give them back now, or else. And, is that my shirt? That's it, you thief, I'll see you in court.
Perhaps they want to get their hands back on the camera as it may fall into the possession of someone who could prove that it could never have worked on the moon anyway, but was fine in the mock-up lunar landscape they fooled everybody with ;-)
I think it's a mistake and he was given it. Verizon makes mistakes on my billing monthly it seems, nasa wouldn't have done the same? I think he deserves something for his journey and can sell it in his old age if he likes, why not? Also, would you condemn Johnny Depp for selling something from Nightmare on Elm Street or the more popular Pirates series if he was possibly given it and then new management forgot 40 years later?
Though I appreciate the news and enjoyed being informed on this topic, this article is saturated with writer opinion. If this were a blog article, or if it were labeled as an opinion piece, it would be no big deal, but I thought this was supposed to be a news article. The writer didn't even have the decency to at least be subtle about his opinion.
As for the camera, if Edgar Mitchell can provide evidence and/or witnesses that NASA gifted that camera to him, then I hope that everyone involved has the decency to drop the issue at that point. But if no such evidence exists, then I don't blame NASA for pursuing this. While this may be one little camera, it is still a case of property theft (however innocent) and resale, and they don't want to encourage future employees to do the same.
my guess is that back in the 70's, things weren't as ridiculous as they are now, so they were probably given as gifts without any paperwork because they all thought it was a good idea. Even if there was, where would they go to find it? One piece of paperwork amidst millions? I'd hate that job, but it still pays I guess. haha
Yeah... why the heck would they care about a camera??? Even if it was stolen, it's 40 years after the fact! Isn't there a statute of limitation on this kind of thing? I think this is a waste of the court's time, and of our federal tax dollars... 40 years... come on people! Let's use a bit of common sense here! He probably just asked his mission commander, hey can I have this camera now that you guys have taken the film out, as a souvenir? And they said sure, we won't use it again anyway. And now that he's trying to make a couple bucks off of it, they get po'd because they're hurting for money. Bureaucrats! Who needs 'em?
i agree with NASA. it is their property and unless they give it to him. besides the technology is old but i wonder what NASA will do with it unless this camera has more potential and NASA is trying to cover up something. like a bigger lawsuit that they copied the technology from someone else. lol