New iPod Shuffle Gets Really Tiny, Loses Control

Status
Not open for further replies.

tayb

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2009
663
0
18,930
0
Um. The shuffle can only be used with Apple branded headphones? How is that not anti-competitive?

If Microsoft released some software that could only be used with a Microsoft keyboard there would have been two dozen lawsuits filed before it even hit the shelves.
 

tipoo

Distinguished
May 4, 2006
271
0
18,930
0
In Soviet Apple, Shuffle plays you!


Don't want to use iTunes? Want to use your own ear buds? Lost your Apple ear buds?

Well TOO BAD!


Plus its the worlds first MP3 player that comes with a "Choking Hazard" sticker.
 

idisarmu

Distinguished
Mar 23, 2008
244
0
18,830
0
....was the old one not small enough? I think apple went stupid with this one- they should have just made the old one into a 2gb player and added a tiny screen (similar to the zen stone plus in function, but much smaller package)
 

SneakySnake

Distinguished
Jan 28, 2009
179
0
18,630
0
It will only be a matter of time before 3rd party headphones come out, the device was only released today.

iTunes is a top class product, only fan boys have problems with it
 

nukemaster

Distinguished
Moderator
[citation][nom]tipoo[/nom]In Soviet Apple, Shuffle plays you!Don't want to use iTunes? Want to use your own ear buds? Lost your Apple ear buds?Well TOO BAD!Plus its the worlds first MP3 player that comes with a "Choking Hazard" sticker.[/citation]
POST OF THE DAY!
 

tipoo

Distinguished
May 4, 2006
271
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]nukemaster[/nom]POST OF THE DAY![/citation]

And yet the comment rating remains at zero...Show me some love, people!
 

grieve

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
694
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]tayb[/nom]Um. The shuffle can only be used with Apple branded headphones? How is that not anti-competitive?If Microsoft released some software that could only be used with a Microsoft keyboard there would have been two dozen lawsuits filed before it even hit the shelves.[/citation]
+1 no Doubt!

Especially after reading all this junk about M$ and the EU
 

pharge

Distinguished
Feb 23, 2009
290
0
18,930
0
"Apple did tell Gizmodo that it does plan to offer and adapter so that those who wish to use their own headphones can do so – but keeping the adapter is vital." Hope they (apple or 3rd party) will release the adapter soon so people can use their favor earphone/headphone and most of all... play their music in the car.
Just curios, by adding an adaptor on the "reduced size" shuffle... will that make it the same or even bigger than before? Since the sound quality of the previous shuffle was not as good as other ipod/itouch, I am wondering that have they make the sound quality better this time?... or even worse?....
 

grieve

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
694
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]SneakySnake[/nom]iTunes is a top class product, only fan boys have problems with it[/citation]
I don’t have a problem with ITunes so much as the fact i HAVE to use it...

I have an Iphone and i hate HAVING to use ITunes... i can’t even use a different PC. Which raises a whole new issue; if i format I have to format my phone too... It’s beyond stupidity!
 

tayb

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2009
663
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]SneakySnake[/nom]It will only be a matter of time before 3rd party headphones come out, the device was only released today.iTunes is a top class product, only fan boys have problems with it[/citation]

iTunes is a top class application on OS X. The Windows version is a bloated poorly written crap of an application. Not to mention the fact that you HAVE to use it if you want to use an iPod or iPhone.
 

jacobdrj

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
490
0
18,930
1
This seems very un-Apple. They strive for intuitiveness, simplicity, and elegance. This is the complete opposite of that! Requiring an adapter is about as complex as any MP3 player on the market. And controls on the headphone wires are unsightly and clunky. I would have thought they would have gone the route of the new Nano, and have a shake feature, or something like that. But they changed something for the sake of change.
I am no fan of the shuffle, and it's minimalist approach, but I do appreciate the niche market that it fills, and the simplicity of its function with software, such as iTunes. But this is a step in the wrong direction, even by my sophisticated standards!
What they SHOULD have done was use either a 'shake' style shuffle, in conjunction with being Bluetooth/wireless ONLY! Controls can be on the headset, as are already on Bluetooth headsets.
 

theubersmurf

Distinguished
Jul 29, 2008
55
0
18,580
0
If you watch the little promotional video for the thing on apple's website, they run down how it is used. By clicking and holding down the button until it beeps, it can tell you what playlist you're listening to, it will run down the list of all of the playlists on the ipod, and you select the one you want to listen to when the name comes up. The problem with this is...it relies on people using timing, though it doesn't take much, it's still a bad system. An ipod is used on the go, other things going on around you is fairly likely...really it's not a good way to navigate. While I like the shuffle for not having the large battery draining screen (I have a 2nd gen shuffle) I don't want bizarre control schemes to fiddle with. Nor do I want to be locked into Apple's headphones. While I like the look of it, and the size of the ipod (and it's relatively large storage for it's size) the control scheme and what it forces people to use as headphones make it a no-buy for me. bad control design imo.
 
G

Guest

Guest
$79 for that garbage?

When you can get a 16GB Sansa View for about $60, which has a normal sized color screen and a microsdhc slot that's expandable by up to another 16GB?

Once again, no thanks Apple.
 

MafiaAce

Distinguished
Apr 16, 2006
2
0
18,510
0
$79 for that garbage?

When you can get a 16GB Sansa View for about $60, which has a normal sized color screen and a microsdhc slot that's expandable by up to another 16GB?

Once again, no thanks Apple.
 

Sicundercover

Distinguished
Dec 2, 2007
125
0
18,630
0
[citation][nom]tayb[/nom]iTunes is a top class application on OS X. The Windows version is a bloated poorly written crap of an application. Not to mention the fact that you HAVE to use it if you want to use an iPod or iPhone.[/citation]

WinAmp now manages iTunes alos. I hated Winamp for years but now its a completely different program.
 

skine

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2009
75
0
18,580
0
[citation][nom]Sicundercover[/nom]WinAmp now manages iTunes alos. I hated Winamp for years but now its a completely different program.[/citation]

You can also use songbird to sync most mp3 players (except the Zune). It's an open source music player that's built off of Mozilla's XULrunner platform, and probably is the easiest subscription (what they call a podcast) manager I've come across.
 

lexspecialis

Distinguished
Feb 8, 2009
9
0
18,510
0
iPod's stock earphone (yes, those white earphones) produces crappy sound, and i have to stick with it if i don't want to carry around an adapter? And i suppose that adapter won't come free either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
U Streaming Video & TVs 2
A Streaming Video & TVs 2
S Streaming Video & TVs 1
M Streaming Video & TVs 1
J Streaming Video & TVs 1
P Streaming Video & TVs 6
R Streaming Video & TVs 12
M Streaming Video & TVs 1
S Streaming Video & TVs 3
L Streaming Video & TVs 2
K Streaming Video & TVs 5
M Streaming Video & TVs 5
Q Streaming Video & TVs 2
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 42
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 17
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 26
Marcus Yam Streaming Video & TVs 30
Marcus Yam Streaming Video & TVs 20
Marcus Yam Streaming Video & TVs 31
G Streaming Video & TVs 3

ASK THE COMMUNITY