[citation][nom]JohnnyLucky[/nom]This is a very confusing article. There is an awful lot of missing information. I understand what the individual did. Unfortunately the article does not say why or how the web site is involved.[/citation]
[citation][nom]derek2006[/nom]I don't get it? What was so bad about the website?[/citation]
[citation][nom]gnookergi[/nom]What does him being a pedophile have anything to do with whether using his site it right or wrong?[/citation]
My thoughts exactly. Okay the maker of the web site is a convicted pedo, but what if anything did this have to do with the site its self. I would have thought, based on the title of the article, the site had pedo material hidden somewhere or was used to get into contact with kids or something. Sadly nothing one way or the other. If the site was done by a pedo scum bag, and if it had nothing wrong with it other than the author then I really do not see the problem.