News Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic isn’t worth the money — here’s why

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 12, 2021
2
0
10
0
I definitely prefer the clean look of the Watch 4, but ended up ordering the Classic black version for the durability of stainless steel and the screen protecting nature of the Bezel. A couple of accidental whacks of my watch into a door frame left the aluminum marred and screen scuffed. What can I say, I am clumsy. The price difference is a bit much.
 
Aug 25, 2021
1
1
10
0
I think there should be some offense taken by someone insisting something gives off a "dad vibe" as their main reason for not recommending the increased cost of this device. Is this a fashion device or is it a piece of high-tech equipment whose additional feature, made with superior materials, enhances use? Make no mistake, the bezel enhances the Watch's usability, nevermind that, much like Viking79 notes, the bezel has saved my phone's screen on multiple occasions. There's a reason Samsung is still including it as a main feature.

The price difference of $100 to include a waterproof rotating bezel and an upgrade in material durability is 100% justified.

And if we are trafficking in sexist tropes like "dad vibe," I will counter that perhaps the meatier bezel option, in addition to being a usability enhancement, is also a purposefully more-masculine design aesthetic. And it's one that can be better appreciated by a male user, who posses in general, larger bones and more muscle around their arms. A meatier watch looks better-proportioned on their wrist, and it may be something they desire.

I don't think a woman would appreciate a man reviewing women's accessories and dismissing them for having "grandma vibes" or "little girl vibes" or "unprofessional vibes," so I'm thinking maybe a woman shouldn't pass judgement on the kind of aesthetics a man desires in their tech equipment. Especially, again, when that aesthetic enhances usability as opposed to detracting from it.
 
Reactions: SandaruLewis
Aug 25, 2021
1
0
10
0
I think there should be some offense taken by someone insisting something gives off a "dad vibe" as their main reason for not recommending the increased cost of this device. Is this a fashion device or is it a piece of high-tech equipment whose additional feature, made with superior materials, enhances use? Make no mistake, the bezel enhances the Watch's usability, nevermind that, much like Viking79 notes, the bezel has saved my phone's screen on multiple occasions. There's a reason Samsung is still including it as a main feature.

The price difference of $100 to include a waterproof rotating bezel and an upgrade in material durability is 100% justified.

And if we are trafficking in sexist tropes like "dad vibe," I will counter that perhaps the meatier bezel option, in addition to being a usability enhancement, is also a purposefully more-masculine design aesthetic. And it's one that can be better appreciated by a male user, who posses in general, larger bones and more muscle around their arms. A meatier watch looks better-proportioned on their wrist, and it may be something they desire.

I don't think a woman would appreciate a man reviewing women's accessories and dismissing them for having "grandma vibes" or "little girl vibes" or "unprofessional vibes," so I'm thinking maybe a woman shouldn't pass judgement on the kind of aesthetics a man desires in their tech equipment. Especially, again, when that aesthetic enhances usability as opposed to detracting from it.
Exactly. This is one of the dumbest reviews I have seen
 
Aug 26, 2021
1
0
10
0
Wow harsh. One should actually have a good sense of fashion before diving into aesthetic commentary. The classic absolutely has the style of a typical fashion watch, definitely masculine, with moving parts, metal, and when paired with the leather bands looks great. It's a good compromise between wanting a sophisticated look and wanting to track your health and have access to the tech. The base watch looks sleek and modern too but it's a sporty, modern tech look. It looks good but it and the Apple Watch aren't "fashionable". They're slabs of glass that obviously look like a mini computer screen.
 
Sep 1, 2021
1
0
10
0
100%.
I think there should be some offense taken by someone insisting something gives off a "dad vibe" as their main reason for not recommending the increased cost of this device. Is this a fashion device or is it a piece of high-tech equipment whose additional feature, made with superior materials, enhances use? Make no mistake, the bezel enhances the Watch's usability, nevermind that, much like Viking79 notes, the bezel has saved my phone's screen on multiple occasions. There's a reason Samsung is still including it as a main feature.

The price difference of $100 to include a waterproof rotating bezel and an upgrade in material durability is 100% justified.

And if we are trafficking in sexist tropes like "dad vibe," I will counter that perhaps the meatier bezel option, in addition to being a usability enhancement, is also a purposefully more-masculine design aesthetic. And it's one that can be better appreciated by a male user, who posses in general, larger bones and more muscle around their arms. A meatier watch looks better-proportioned on their wrist, and it may be something they desire.

I don't think a woman would appreciate a man reviewing women's accessories and dismissing them for having "grandma vibes" or "little girl vibes" or "unprofessional vibes," so I'm thinking maybe a woman shouldn't pass judgement on the kind of aesthetics a man desires in their tech equipment. Especially, again, when that aesthetic enhances usability as opposed to detracting from it.
100%. I made an account on here just so I could chime in about how much clickbait trash this review is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 1
admin Article Commentary 1
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 2
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
admin Article Commentary 0
Similar threads
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro — who is it for?
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 vs. Google Pixel Watch — which smartwatch could win?
This is the one reason I won't buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 skin temperature sensor — how does it work?
Where to preorder the Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro
Review Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 hands-on review: First impressions of all the new features
Review Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 Pro hands-on review: Outdoor-friendly, amazing battery life
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 vs. Galaxy Watch 5 Pro — what's different?
News Samsung Unpacked live blog: Galaxy Z Fold 4, Galaxy Z Flip 4, Galaxy Watch 5 and more
News How to watch Samsung Unpacked event: Galaxy Z Fold 4, Z Flip 4, Galaxy Watch 5 and more
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 design and price just leaked — and it looks like there’s a Pro model
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 — the 5 biggest rumors so far
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 just stole the Apple Watch 7’s killer feature
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro just leaked — see them from every angle
News Samsung Unpacked Event August 2022 — Galaxy Z Fold 4, Galaxy Z Flip 4, Galaxy Watch 5 and more
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 release — here's what to expect
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 rumored price might surprise you
This Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 deal gets you up to $1,200 off and a free Galaxy Watch 4
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 vs. Galaxy Watch 4 — biggest rumored upgrades
News Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 leak tips all color options

ASK THE COMMUNITY