Sony Hopes Nintendo's 3DS Does Well

Status
Not open for further replies.

Darkerson

Distinguished
Oct 28, 2009
231
0
18,830
He has an interesting way of looking at things. Even with the little jab at the end, there was a lot of praise to be had. Not exactly what I expected them to say about a competitor.
 

fjjb

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2010
81
0
18,580
what he really said is that they better do good or our next psp will blow their asses off..... maybe it was a subliminal message....
 

belardo

Distinguished
Nov 23, 2008
1,143
0
19,230
Just like it took MS 10 years to come out with an actual consumer OS that is a GUI and multi-tasks... long after Amiga and Mac hit the market in 1985.
 

reprotected

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2009
126
0
18,640
That explains why Sony wanted the Wii to be successful, so then can release their own stupid remotes so that everyone will buy it. I think the 3DS can be quite successful, it's like an upgrade from the GBA to GBA SP.
 

nukemaster

Distinguished
Moderator
[citation][nom]kinggraves[/nom]Sony wants it to succeed.That way in 5 years they can copy it on PSP3 and act like it's amazing.[/citation]
+9999
That is exactly what it is. So many things Sony copied from Nintendo. Analog stick(but we used 2), rumble pack(we used 2 of those as well) are the first that come to my mind.
 

nottheking

Distinguished
Jan 5, 2006
311
0
18,930
[citation][nom]reprotected[/nom]I think the 3DS can be quite successful, it's like an upgrade from the GBA to GBA SP.[/citation]
Well, hardware-wise, it's a bigger jump than that. Judging from what I'm actually SEEING on it, and the comments from Nintendo on having a worse battery life than any DS, the 3DS will be vastly, vastly more powerful; think like a PS3 if it was limited to 240p instead of 720p. (i.e, about 1/9th the pixel count)

[citation][nom]iam2thecrowe[/nom]is it just me, or does 3D on a small screen seem pointless and not very effective? Even on a large TV it doesnt work that well.[/citation]
Actually, from what those that've tried have said, and what logic dictates, says it works well: because only one person will be looking straight at it, that drastically simplifies things; no worries at all about viewing angle.

[citation][nom]Belardo[/nom]Just like it took MS 10 years to come out with an actual consumer OS that is a GUI and multi-tasks... long after Amiga and Mac hit the market in 1985.[/citation]
Coincidentally, 1985 was the year Windows 1.0 came out; I guess you forgot that there was ANY Windows be '95 (aka Windows 4.0) let alone these.

The PC platform was only plagued by price; a VGA card was vastly superior to anything any console or competitor could do, but at that time 256KB of RAM (when 8-64KB was standard) was expensive as hell, hence it was the equivalent of a Radeon 5970 today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.