[citation][nom]reprotected[/nom]I think the 3DS can be quite successful, it's like an upgrade from the GBA to GBA SP.[/citation]
Well, hardware-wise, it's a bigger jump than that. Judging from what I'm actually SEEING on it, and the comments from Nintendo on having a worse battery life than any DS, the 3DS will be vastly, vastly more powerful; think like a PS3 if it was limited to 240p instead of 720p. (i.e, about 1/9th the pixel count)
[citation][nom]iam2thecrowe[/nom]is it just me, or does 3D on a small screen seem pointless and not very effective? Even on a large TV it doesnt work that well.[/citation]
Actually, from what those that've tried have said, and what logic dictates, says it works well: because only one person will be looking straight at it, that drastically simplifies things; no worries at all about viewing angle.
[citation][nom]Belardo[/nom]Just like it took MS 10 years to come out with an actual consumer OS that is a GUI and multi-tasks... long after Amiga and Mac hit the market in 1985.[/citation]
Coincidentally, 1985 was the
year Windows 1.0 came out; I guess you forgot that there was ANY Windows be '95 (aka Windows 4.0) let alone these.
The PC platform was only plagued by price; a VGA card was vastly superior to anything any console or competitor could do, but at that time 256KB of RAM (when 8-64KB was standard) was expensive as hell, hence it was the equivalent of a Radeon 5970 today.