Thank you for the balanced and fair review; it's disheartening to see how the game is being received and it doesn't deserve it.
Balanced and fair reviews usually involve discussing some aspect of the gameplay that doesn't suck before you praise the game lmao.
This review is fine, and the reviewer is allowed to feel however they want, but it's effectively "actually playing the game is bad but I like Star wars so"
That's the opposite of balanced and fair, and it's unfortunate you have to project that onto people who are ACTUALLY being balanced and fair and pointing out that a game where the main systems of interacting with it (gun combat or stealth) are both bad, objectively, the game is itself...bad. Its not unbiased to call a bad game ok, it's fake neutrality.
Outlaws absolutely deserves the bad reception, the stealth feels legitimately unfinished (2002 stealth games had body moving figured out) and the gun combat is gears of war 1 level which is again...over a decade old. Completely tired and uninteresting. The devs even basically act like the game is unfinished, they keep promising "more content" - but they sold the game already for $120!
People aren't wrong to point out it's a mediocre to bad product especially given the immense development time and investment, and they aren't biased just because they aren't saying "eh it's okay" or "yay it's great" like you want them to.