Town Uses Google Earth to Look for Illegal Pools

Status
Not open for further replies.

whiz

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2009
18
0
18,560
0
Privacy advocates, however, say that using satellite images to sniff out pool permit-dodgers is a big brother move, especially by using an educational tool like Google Earth in a policing manner.
BS.
 

howardp6

Distinguished
Aug 19, 2008
67
0
18,590
2
You did not get a permit you got caught, you have to pay. I have problem with that. Using Google Earth should not be an issue, anyone can use it, why not the township.
 

welshmousepk

Distinguished
Sep 12, 2009
274
0
18,960
7
No, i would agree that this is an invasion of privacy.

its irrelevant what crime a person is or is not guilty of, this is the equivalent of planting a camera in a persons home to catch them illegally downloading movies. i'm sure this cannot be legal.


 

vizzie

Distinguished
Jul 27, 2009
7
0
18,510
0
How is this less legal than someone who works for the municipality walking past gardens to check for pools? It's just more efficient.
 

Raid3r

Distinguished
Oct 20, 2008
69
0
18,580
0
Its a hole with water and all was peachy because of PRIVACY fences..I guess we are going to have to start building privacy overheads now..oh wait that's ANOTHER permit...from the city with love.
 

anamaniac

Distinguished
Jan 7, 2009
1,035
0
19,230
0
[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]As no-one was asked permission for Google to photograph from orbit, could the usage of the pictures constitute an illegal search?See you in court.[/citation]
I support this.

If I want to build a pool in my backyard, they only thing I'll do is call the city to make sure there isn't any water/gas pipes (which shouldn't even be a issue, because they put them under the roads here).
I fully, honestly believe that, if I think a law is complete BS, then I'll ignore it (it's illegal to spit on the ground or even a trashcan in my city).

This sounds like someone is just trying to catch lawbreakers, not actually trying to catch those who are harming society.
 

ssddx

Glorious
Moderator
"Riverhead's chief building inspector Leroy Barnes Jr. said that permits are required to ensure that all pools meet safety requirements."

No, what they really want is to add the value to your home to increase their tax revenue. I can see having an inspection of your pool, but its pretty bad when you need a permit just to change shingles on your home.

Using google earth could be seen as an invasion of privacy as stated prior. As for the inspectors "walking by" if they came on your property they would be tresspassing and we all know how legal that is. I'll stick with the catch me if you can slogan for BS township ideas like this.
 

nezzymighty

Distinguished
Apr 11, 2010
12
0
18,560
0
[citation][nom]anamaniac[/nom] ... I fully, honestly believe that, if I think a law is complete BS, then I'll ignore it ... This sounds like someone is just trying to catch lawbreakers, not actually trying to catch those who are harming society.[/citation]

Ultimately, you can choose which laws to obey. But this doesn't preclude you from those laws. These individuals committed crimes. They must pay the penalties according to those offenses. They are harming society because they are not following the letter of the law. Case in point - if your child dies as a result of these standards they didn't follow, that inspectors would have deemed hazardous and requiring correction, then the onus falls on them who broke the law to pay the price. The law is the law.

If you decide you are above the law, and start to choose which laws to obey, how many more laws will you begin to ignore as your morals degrade. As the only perfect man said when he walked this earth: "Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much."
 

myriad46

Distinguished
Feb 6, 2008
29
0
18,580
0
[citation][nom]ssddx[/nom]"Riverhead's chief building inspector Leroy Barnes Jr. said that permits are required to ensure that all pools meet safety requirements."No, what they really want is to add the value to your home to increase their tax revenue. I can see having an inspection of your pool, but its pretty bad when you need a permit just to change shingles on your home. Using google earth could be seen as an invasion of privacy as stated prior. As for the inspectors "walking by" if they came on your property they would be tresspassing and we all know how legal that is. I'll stick with the catch me if you can slogan for BS township ideas like this.[/citation]

Pools often decrease home value. The permit (and inspection process) are to ensure that the enclosure for the pool is up to code. That is so that when your 2 year old wanders into your neighbors yard where they just installed a pool with no fence, you won't find them floating face down.

If it can't be seen from the road, it's over stepping their jurisdiction. Maybe they should buy a helicopter.
 

sykozis

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2008
338
0
18,930
0
[citation][nom]vizzie[/nom]How is this less legal than someone who works for the municipality walking past gardens to check for pools? It's just more efficient.[/citation]

In some towns/cities/etc, the police/regulatory agency/etc are restricted to what's in view without the homeowner's conscent. So, say they walk past your house...you have an "illegal" pool in your backyard. If it's in "plain view" of the street....you're SOL. If you have a 6" fence blocking the view of said pool, the police/regulatary agency/etc is SOL because it'd be considered trespassing for them to enter the property without your permission. The same should apply to the use of Google Earth. You have no given Google concent to photograph your property, thus making the action an invasion of privacy. Which would prohibit the police/regulatory agency/etc from legally using Google Earth to further invade your privacy.

BTW, Google has been sued over photography people's property without conscent in the past....and LOST. By law, in most states anyway, if there's a "No Trespassing" sign in place...it's illegal to enter the property in any manor...including aerial/orbital photographs.
 

awood28211

Distinguished
Aug 1, 2007
124
0
18,630
0
"Riverhead's chief building inspector Leroy Barnes Jr. said that permits are required to ensure that all pools meet safety requirements."

Correction:

"Riverhead's chief building inspector Leroy Barnes Jr. said that permits are required to ensure that...we can properly tax and fee all residents to our greatest extent."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Streaming Video & TVs 0
E Streaming Video & TVs 1
P Streaming Video & TVs 4
Adom Streaming Video & TVs 2
R Streaming Video & TVs 0
R Streaming Video & TVs 0
G Streaming Video & TVs 6
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 10
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 7
G Streaming Video & TVs 13
G Streaming Video & TVs 13
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 12
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 6
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 79
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 17
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 38
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 70
exfileme Streaming Video & TVs 28
JMcEntegart Streaming Video & TVs 1
G Streaming Video & TVs 1

ASK THE COMMUNITY