Ubuntu 10.10-Powered Tablet in the Works

Status
Not open for further replies.

aftcomet

Distinguished
Nov 25, 2010
162
0
18,630
I have zero interest in this unless it offers better battery life, faster performance, etc over a windows counter-part.
 

indian-art

Distinguished
Sep 15, 2009
8
0
18,510
@Aftcomet 'unless it offers better battery life, faster performance, etc over a windows counter-part.'

Better battery life than Windows!!!! Now that should be easy -> Try iPad, Notion Ink, ARM tablets .....
 

davewolfgang

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2010
69
0
18,590
I don't understand why you'd need a stripped down version. I have the full version of 10.10 on my netbook, Asus EeePC 1005HAB. It runs great, it's fast and with the advanced power settings I can get over an extra hour out of the battery than Windows XP (originally on it).
 

phate

Distinguished
Oct 23, 2009
43
0
18,580
Since Windows has yet to run on an ARM tablet... it has infinitely greater battery life.

Or I could just say there is no windows counter-part.
 

WheelsOfConfusion

Distinguished
Aug 18, 2008
341
0
18,930
[citation][nom]Phate[/nom]Since Windows has yet to run on an ARM tablet... it has infinitely greater battery life. Or I could just say there is no windows counter-part.[/citation]
This particular slate is going to be Atom-based, though. Hopefully it will have decent graphics drivers, I hear the Unity interface is a bit heavier than the old Netbook Remix interface.
 

cmartin011

Distinguished
Jan 15, 2010
119
0
18,630
Ubuntu is good operating system it would be better than windows on this type of system could go browsing all the porn sites with fear of getting a nasty virus or Trojan
 

nevertell

Distinguished
Oct 18, 2009
93
0
18,580
Why oh why should I use a linux powered X86 tablet ?

The whole point of using linux on a tablet is that you can have a widely supported OS on a powersipping ARM chip.
 

Silmarunya

Distinguished
Nov 3, 2009
390
0
18,930
This is what Unity was made for. It's in the current netbook release, but didn't really shine there. Everything about Unity just shouts 'touch me!'.

Windows on tablets is clunky. It's slow, it's UI doesn't work very well with touch and most of its functionality is hampered. Unity on the other hand works very well on tablets, especially given the upcoming support for multi-touch.

The only problem is that Natty Narwhal will bring Unity to desktops. I've got nothing against it, but I don't see it working on a massive widescreen monitor. Fortunately, it's still Linux. Don't like a part of its UI? There's an app/script/whatever for that!
 

JOSHSKORN

Distinguished
Oct 26, 2009
952
0
18,930
Tablets and Linux. FINALLY a more practical use for an awesome operating system that nobody uses. I hope we see more Linux clients in the future.
 

claudecat

Distinguished
Nov 6, 2010
7
0
18,510
Ubuntu gets too much press, but this seems a positive development if it turns out to be real. Other linuxes like Mint or PCLinuxOS often work better for the average dabbler into the linux world. You may think you're a geek because you play state of the art games with sli/crossfire etc, but you will never be a true geek until you grok linux. I suppose the ultimate would be successfully installing Gentoo or the dreaded LFS (linux from scratch). Hehe... that being said, Mint or PCLOS are as easy to install as any windows program, as long as you understand partitioning. 10 minute install and friendly dual boot with windows of any flavor. Try that when installing windows... it'll make any linux partitions you may have invisible. Search youtube for Steve Ballmer and get ready to laugh until you begin to cry. It's fun!
 

reggieray

Distinguished
Nov 4, 2010
191
0
18,630
[citation][nom]davewolfgang[/nom]I don't understand why you'd need a stripped down version. I have the full version of 10.10 on my netbook, Asus EeePC 1005HAB. It runs great, it's fast and with the advanced power settings I can get over an extra hour out of the battery than Windows XP (originally on it).[/citation]
Same here, dual boot it on my net book. I only keep XP because of iTunes.
 

claudecat

Distinguished
Nov 6, 2010
7
0
18,510
My main issue with Ubuntu is that they appear to be aiming towards Unity and Wayland... both unproven as of yet. To expect Windows refugees to make sense of either of these seems worthy of ridicule... but maybe they'll be able to iron out any difficulties by the time 11.04 is released. I'll always be a Mint fan (especially now that the Debian based version is available in 64bit), but I must give Ubuntu credit for marketing strength if nothing else.
 

flightmare

Distinguished
Jan 12, 2009
24
0
18,560
[citation][nom]ReggieRay[/nom]Same here, dual boot it on my net book. I only keep XP because of iTunes.[/citation]Why? A lot of linux media players have iPod support ;)
 

slipdisc

Distinguished
Dec 13, 2005
45
0
18,580
[citation][nom]flightmare[/nom]Why? A lot of linux media players have iPod support[/citation]
I wasnt aware of any that support syncing of apps and movie rentals. Theres more to ipods than just mp3s. Especially when you consider that standard ipods make up only a very small percentage of Apple's pmp sales. Thats a huge change from just a few years ago.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Claudecat, Wayland is purely on the back end, it won't make a bit of difference to the end user (except for greatly improved performance, of course). X11 is outdated, the top feature of X11 is that it can allow you to run applications over a network, which no longer has value, since the modern standard is to just write a web application that can be run in any web browser.

Future releases of Unity are mostly just bringing some 3d Compiz bling to the desktop without requiring the user to learn 1000+ hotkeys to initiate the FX. This lowers the barrier to entry for being a L337 Linux g33k with a desktop cube that spins around. Besides, it's just another taskbar to click on, there's not a whole lot to get your head around.
 

kronos_cornelius

Distinguished
Nov 4, 2009
14
0
18,560
I tried Unity on a netbook with ATI graphics, and it was buggy, so I switch to Kubuntu with the KDE desktop. For tables, I would go with Android, it is open source as well and looks to have a wider market share. I do recommend Ubuntu/Kubuntu for Desktop use though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.