[citation][nom]jldevoy[/nom]of course not, whats the problem with entrusting everyones safety to a $499 device with a consumer OS that may or may not function reliably over the long term in a pressurised environment.[/citation]
planes are pressurized to what we normally have on the surface.
and if its just looking at pictures, and reading, the ipad can more or less be trusted with that, and worse come to worse, you have trained pilots and radios and radar for a reason.
[citation][nom]jcesmi[/nom]They better make sure they turn them off before and during flight, or lese it will mess up the navigation guidance system..... Oh Wait.....[/citation]
this is largely a myth, but some instruments ARE effected by that kind of equipment. however out of 10 phones, only 1 may screw with 1 dial, you blanket the ban on everything just to make it easier to regulate, and not have to be knowledgeable of 1000+ types of phones.
[citation][nom]apache_lives[/nom]More importantly is battery life, stolen property and above all thats bugging me
O AIRCRAFT HAVE CIGARETTE LIGHTER POWER SOCKETS IN THE COCKPITS TO RECHARGE THINGS WITH!?!?!??!!??[/citation]
an external battery that can keep it going for 24+ hours shouldn't be to hard to acquire/make.
all that said, they are doing away with 418000lbs of material.
and lets say it costs 10$ per 200 pages, thats 600$ a book, the ipad actually payed for itself. in multiple ways.