Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (
More info?)
"Deep Reset" <DeepReset@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cqsbpm$k1j$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> "Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
> news:ty_xd.60906$ka2.48451@fed1read04...
> >
> > "Tony" <news-reply@t-onywoolf.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:l%Yxd.4417$Ar5.3487@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> >> I have a new Konica Minolta Z3. The manual says clearly that the only
> >> batteries that should be used are alkaline or NiMH. I will be buying
> > some
> >> NiMh batteries but I already have some NiCads so is there a real reason
> > why
> >> I shouldn't use them as backup? Or is it just that they won't last
very
> >> long?
> >> --
> >> Tony W
> >> My e-mail address has no hypen
> >> - but please don't use it, reply to the group.
> >
> > NiMh batteries have taken over. Few use Nicads, because NiMh batteries
> > can
> > be charged and recharged without fully depleting them...and because they
> > pack a real punch for high-draw devices like dicicams and flash.
> >
> > You can use Nicads all you like, but probably won't be impressed with
> > performance compared with NiMh.
>
> On the contrary, NiCds with their lower internal resistances will deliver
> *much* higher currents (into the 10s of amps) than NiMhs (2-3 amps), and
can
> charge flashguns much more quickly.
> Simple capacity is not all - for instance, it is possible to buy 14Ah
> alkaline 'D' cells, but that capacity is at maybe 10s of milliamps drain
> rates - you _won't_ get 14 amps for one hour out of them, but you should
get
> 14 milliamps for 1000 hours.
>
> Deep.
I said nothing to the contrary, but instead pointed to the
charging/depletion characteristics that differentiate the two types. This
is where NiMH shine compared with NiCad.