G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (More info?)
Jason wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:13:26 -0500, Zardozz wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Why the hell do you think I'm trying to revise history? other than because
>>it suits the arguements you like to create. All I did was state another
>>reason for missing the expected recording that he could have prevented. The
>>statement that it was his own fault is still just as valid even though there
>>are other reasons to support it.
>
>
> Zardoz, I was not shown a conflict screen when I scheduled the
> 6/15 recording. The conflict popped up when the network changed
> the show's length and caused a fake-conflict.
>
> Randy, save your breath. I doubt he's gonna admit his mistake.
>
I'm sure you're right. Interesting that they changed the duration to
1:01 rather than entering it that way in the first place. That only
makes things that much tougher!
Randy S.
Jason wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:13:26 -0500, Zardozz wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Why the hell do you think I'm trying to revise history? other than because
>>it suits the arguements you like to create. All I did was state another
>>reason for missing the expected recording that he could have prevented. The
>>statement that it was his own fault is still just as valid even though there
>>are other reasons to support it.
>
>
> Zardoz, I was not shown a conflict screen when I scheduled the
> 6/15 recording. The conflict popped up when the network changed
> the show's length and caused a fake-conflict.
>
> Randy, save your breath. I doubt he's gonna admit his mistake.
>
I'm sure you're right. Interesting that they changed the duration to
1:01 rather than entering it that way in the first place. That only
makes things that much tougher!
Randy S.