[citation][nom]f-14[/nom]it's funny how people think this way.it's funny how people think business is all fair and follows letters of the law JUST LIKE EVERYONE IN THE WORLD DOES!...
... i'm sure intel loves giving away their patent rights, and why nvidia is not scrambling to stay in business due to not being able to aquire new lisc.'ing from intel and being shut out of amd due to amd having it's own graphics and scaling system.[/citation]
Most of the trouble we have are with Software process patents, ie: "putting Widget X on top of Widget Y" or "A device to sort widgets", "Making Widgets X shaped to fit in X shaped holes"..
They are by design vague, often too vague as to encompass enormous portions of our society. Due to how backlogged the Patent office is in the US, a lot get through that should not. I would also not be surprised if there was some collusion as well.
Sure have patents on your gadget, but long standing patents on how to do some things that are the next logical step, No.
The patent office needs to get rid of these Software process patents, many countries do not allow them. The problem is that it takes lawyers, and lawyers hate to give up future business.
The bad news is that there are lobbying groups trying to get other countries to add software patents to what kind of patents they grant. I believe Australia was one such country considering such patents.
These software patents, even when against two big companies usually end up in settlement, and agreements, but those agreements often lock others out of the field, creating large barriers to new business.
Want to know one reason a new business is hard to start in the US? Imagine how much of your budget will be devoted to researching (its YOUR responsibility!) and paying for patents for something NEW you want to build. Sure you might get off the ground a bit, but once you have something worth a damn, Patent lawyers descend like harpies.