Bing's Porn Content Gets NSFW Server

[exfileme]

Last week we reported that Microsoft's Bing "decision" engine can track down and play an impressive "wall of porn," displaying actual thumbnail-sized clips of video when end-users place the mouse curser over the desired clip.

Bing's Porn Content Gets NSFW Server : Read more

 

[aspireonelover]

awnnn....

 

[oersis]

i agree with loggin method

 

[dragonfang18]

Wow... people used it for porn so much it took this much time for them to respond back to it.... I am IMPRESSED! Good job guys!

 

[falchard]

I love BING, it is a very impressive search engine.

 

[dragonfang18]

me 2 I use it second to google.

 

[cruiseoveride]

whats the deal with sex anyways.

A 10 yr old has probably seen what Rambo can do with a machine gun

You can enlist in the army at the age of 17 and start killing people. but you aren't allowed to drink until you're 21.

The legal system in the US is seriously flawed.

 

[Ciuy]

i dont get it, whats so bad if children see a porn site???? WTF they get cancer or what?
Jesus let them see wtf to do and how, filter the homosexual content and stuff only ...

 

[ta152h]

You know, I really don't like Microsoft, but I really do appreciate what they've done with porn. I hope they don't water it down because people complain.

Hell, I'll complain too so I sound holier than though too. But, not at the risk of them diluting the wall of porn that is quickly becoming part of the fabric of American culture. It's got to stop before we lose this! What is it to be American, but to enjoy porn? Microsoft should be applauded for making it even easier with their mouse over play feature. It's this type of innovation that shows Microsoft isn't wasting their billions in research dollars.

I would suggest they rename Internet Explorer though. The name is real lame. I'd suggest "Porn Surfer", and the use of more sexually explicit controls. Or maybe they could do this as a special edition version of Internet Explorer, like those Monopoly special editions. And then refuse to allow this to be distributed to EU countries. Can you imagine the Dutch if they were denied the "Porn Surfer"? They'd leave the EU. Other people rebel against their government and finally put an end to the incessant fining if they were missing out on "feature rich" products like the Porn Surfer. Not that they'd admit to liking porn, of course, they'd say they were just supporting freedom of expression, or something like that.

 

[NuclearShadow]

Well Ciuy there are many reasons. Children shouldn't be exposed to sexual content at young ages and should be old enough to be taught responsibility and fully grasp what sex is before being exposed to it. There is no doubt that the average age of when kids first have sex is shrinking and this is no doubt because of our culture overwhelming with sexual messages. The last thing we need is to expose our children to porn and make the problem worse.

Also your a foolish bigot. Take your homophobic comments elsewhere.

 

[ravewulf]

[citation][nom]Ciuy[/nom]i dont get it, whats so bad if children see a porn site???? WTF they get cancer or what?Jesus let them see wtf to do and how, filter the homosexual content and stuff only ...[/citation]
I'm gay, have a bit of tact OK?

I personally like porn, but it is probably best to "protect the children." Although that's not to say resourceful older teens who are actively searching for the stuff won't be able to get at it (I know I was able to )

 

[NuclearShadow]

Oh and also Ciuy its common for pedophiles to show children pornography and since you seem to think its a good idea... I certainly wouldn't trust you with any kids.

 

[okibrian]

I got an idea; we should block all porn with a filter and call it "Green Dam." Another idea is parents can look after their kids and stop blaming everyone else.

 

[leafblower29]

[citation][nom]Ciuy[/nom]i dont get it, whats so bad if children see a porn site???? WTF they get cancer or what? Jesus let them see wtf to do and how, filter the homosexual content and stuff only ...[/citation]

Kids aren't gonna look up that stuff anyhow so why argue?

 

[knightofmars]

NuclearShadow, check your facts. Over the last two decades the number of "kids" having sex earlier has declined. Also, the odds that they will use a condom their first time has increased. The proliferation of so called "sexual messages" has been offset by sex education and the wonderful global message board known as the internet that you and I are corresponding on right now.

 

[mrubermonkey]

Parents should hire a screening nanny that stays with the children while they surf online and checks the output for every input the children put in before the children can view the results to make sure the childrens' minds do not get warped by any unauthorized content. Not. Get it. That was a "not" joke.

 

[war2k9]

Alright MS finally hit a home run, who knew microsoft knows how to put a search engine together. Google Watch Out.

 

[traken]

What's the difference between Bing and Google with respect to having to log in? None, AFAICT.

So... why does Bing seem to be getting all the heat?

 

[Guest]

This phobia about kids and sexual content is all very american, it's a non-issue on the other side of the pond. As for myself I'd rather my kids look at porn than the evening news, it's less likely to scar the for life.

It's a sick and twisted society we live in when the kind of violence we've made common in our entertainment gets at best a shrug but even a hint of physical love is somehow dangerous and bad.

 

[cyberkuberiah]

Bing is the final word in debauchery .

if u have msn account -> only then safe search off -> only then the adult? material .

look how microsoft could actually use porn as a bait to draw users towards msn .

Dont do that , and let it remain a great adult search engine , of which it really is a "breakthrough" porn server !