Solandri
Distinguished
Everyone and this op-ed is missing the real problem. CurrentC is anti-consumer (draws from debit account so consumers end up paying for fraud). Credit cards are anti-merchant (chargebacks mean the merchant is out the product and the money, so they pay for fraud). Neither can solve the problem of fraud in electronic transactions.The bottom line is that blocking Apple Pay is anti-consumer.
The real problem is that Visa, Mastercard, the banks, etc. have shifted liability away from themselves, and turned it into a game of shifting liability between consumers or merchants. Why does credit card security suck? Because consumers and merchants don't control the transaction network, so they are not in a position to improve security. The companies which operate the credit card networks can improve security, but because they've shifted liability to the merchants (credit cards) or consumers (debit cards), they have no incentive to improve security.
If you want to see real improvement in security for electronic transactions, stop making the consumer or the merchant liable. Pass a law putting liability squarely on the organizations who are in a position to improve security - the credit card companies and the banks.
And if you're curious, those exorbitant credit card interest rates pay for deadbeat credit card holders who default on their bills, not for fraud.