mdillenbeck
Distinguished
Thanks for pointing that out Draven35 - there is something called an unrepresentative sample - and this is a common fallacy people fall for.
For those of you who have forgotten your statistics (or who never had to take it or a rigorous research science course), we can only extrapolate about the population we sampled. When we sample only 18 US cities (in other words, excluding many other cities, smaller urban settings, and all rural settings) then saying the results apply to the entire US currency set is an overgeneralization.
Its kind of like sampling 100 campuses across the US and stating that US citizens are liberal or sampling Nigeria and then concluding 98% of the human population is black.
I fully agree with the lecturer I saw on TED that said we need to change the apex of high school mathematics from calculus to probability and statistics. (For that matter, also change the goal of English from grammar to logic and argument - spelling is important but sound and valid reasoning is critical.)
For those of you who have forgotten your statistics (or who never had to take it or a rigorous research science course), we can only extrapolate about the population we sampled. When we sample only 18 US cities (in other words, excluding many other cities, smaller urban settings, and all rural settings) then saying the results apply to the entire US currency set is an overgeneralization.
Its kind of like sampling 100 campuses across the US and stating that US citizens are liberal or sampling Nigeria and then concluding 98% of the human population is black.
I fully agree with the lecturer I saw on TED that said we need to change the apex of high school mathematics from calculus to probability and statistics. (For that matter, also change the goal of English from grammar to logic and argument - spelling is important but sound and valid reasoning is critical.)