digital audio recorder

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote:

>Len, that's something I wish you would consider. Wordclock
>chainability could be a very signifigant feature for
>relatively low cost options such as yours.

It's a function of the mic pre/A-to-D rather than the PDAudio-CF card.

We'll consider it for future versions of our Mic2496 and other products.

--
Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio
Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com
moskowit@core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Mike Rivers <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote:
> That's why I was asking the question. Maybe a flash card that's
> "affordable" in a couple of years can do an hour at 192 kHz 24-bit
> mono (about 2 GB).

perhaps use real-time lossless encoding (shorten / FLAC / etc) to reduce
the storage requirements?

--
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@poofygoof.com
"someday the industry will have throbbing frontal lobes and will be able
to write provably correct software. also, I want a pony." -- Zach Brown
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <10jvpn3pggnnm4d@corp.supernews.com> agrier@poofygoof.com writes:

> perhaps use real-time lossless encoding (shorten / FLAC / etc) to reduce
> the storage requirements?

At the moment, it probably takes more processing horsepower than can
be packaged in a portable unit, but those things get smaller, cheaper,
and get lower power requirements as time goes on, so it may be a
viable approach.

One problem with a system like this is that we tend not to trust it,
regardles of documented test results (usually) conducted by someone
who wants to sell us the gear or the process or posted on a web page
somewhere based on who knows what measurements. The less you do to an
audio file in order to store and retrieve it, the better. (one more
argument for analog tape)


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

I <moskowit@core-sound.com> wrote:

>A 2 GB compact flash card sells for under $200. A 4 GB card is around $550.
>
>Hitachi just came out with a 10 GB PCMCIA hard drive. It's also selling
>for under $200.

My apologies: the Hitachi drive I referred to is actually an older
external 2.5" hard drive with a PCMCIA (PC Card) interface. IBM used to
sell it as the TravelStar 10E. It is not an internally mounted (slot
mounted) PCMCIA hard drive.

By the way, 4 GB Compact Flash memory cards are about to break the $500
price point. You can buy a SanDisk 4 GB CF card on eBay right now for
$519. 2 GB CF cards are available for under $200.

--
Len Moskowitz PDAudio, Binaural Mics, Cables, DPA, M-Audio
Core Sound http://www.stealthmicrophones.com
Teaneck, New Jersey USA http://www.core-sound.com
moskowit@core-sound.com Tel: 201-801-0812, FAX: 201-801-0912
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1094729414k@trad...
> The less you do to an audio file in order to store and retrieve it, the
better.
> (one more argument for analog tape)

Mike just ignores all the processing needed to convert analog signals to
magnetic domains and back again. Not to mention superimposing on HF, playing
with frequency response, etc etc etc.

TonyP.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <41417db9$0$725$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> TonyP@optus.net.com.au writes:

> Mike just ignores all the processing needed to convert analog signals to
> magnetic domains and back again.

A coil of wire? Isn't this still in the Boy Scout Handbook? Or do
Boy Scouts start with a computer nowadays?


--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1094820766k@trad...
>
> In article <41417db9$0$725$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
TonyP@optus.net.com.au writes:
>
> > Mike just ignores all the processing needed to convert analog signals to
> > magnetic domains and back again.
>
> A coil of wire? Isn't this still in the Boy Scout Handbook? Or do
> Boy Scouts start with a computer nowadays?
>

http://www.teacherlink.usu.edu/tlresources/clipart/BSAMERIT/images/Computers.JPG

Can they build it out of sticks?

jb
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1094820766k@trad...
> In article <41417db9$0$725$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
TonyP@optus.net.com.au writes:
>
> > Mike just ignores all the processing needed to convert analog signals to
> > magnetic domains and back again.
>
> A coil of wire? Isn't this still in the Boy Scout Handbook? Or do
> Boy Scouts start with a computer nowadays?

Sorry, I made the mistake of assuming you were after HiFi. Which is pretty
crazy I guess for someone who thinks his tape recorder is better than his
Lynx.

TonyP.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <41430d74$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> TonyP@optus.net.com.au writes:

> Sorry, I made the mistake of assuming you were after HiFi. Which is pretty
> crazy I guess for someone who thinks his tape recorder is better than his
> Lynx.

For playing tapes, yes.

Are you SURE you're not Phil Allison?

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1094923410k@trad...
>
> In article <41430d74$0$11059$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
TonyP@optus.net.com.au writes:
>
> > Sorry, I made the mistake of assuming you were after HiFi. Which is
pretty
> > crazy I guess for someone who thinks his tape recorder is better than
his
> > Lynx.
>
> For playing tapes, yes.

Do you admit that your original statement that analog tape is "objectively
better" than digital, is bogus then?
(Other than for playing old tapes)

> Are you SURE you're not Phil Allison?

Lets see,
You're making the stupid statements.
You throw in red herrings.
You introduce straw man arguments.
You never admit you're wrong.
You abuse people who disagree with you.

Are you sure *YOU'RE* not Phil Allison?

TonyP.