[citation][nom]aaron88_7[/nom]Clearly you aren't an English major, "For your info"As for being a scientist; what papers have you written? What types of research have you conducted? Where did you get your degree? If you were a real scientist you wouldn't be so quick to blast an article on a scientific discovery when you haven't even read the full research paper.If you want to add something constructive to the discussion go ahead, nobody is stopping you from doing so, but so far you're just complaining because you think you know more than the researchers that made this discovery - a discovery that, while you haven't even read their research, you don't even believe is valid. That is not how real scientists work buddy, papers are written and peers offer criticism, but this is all based on research and real science, not just shouting from a bullhorn proclaiming one knows more simply because they think they are special. You are no scientist, so stop pretending like you are one.[/citation]
Considering you have made on comment at all on the content of the article then your last post is laughable.
Do you have any comment to make about this article in this "comments" section?
Please feel free to do so as I have.
On the other hand some people are capable of nothing more than trolling.
I don't care whether you think I classify as a scientist or not, the fact is I have a scientific qualification, the fact is that everything I've said is factually correct.....If you can dispute those things rather than just launching personal attacks then please do so.