Foxconn: Apple Products Are Difficult To Build

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

mmm2000

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2011
4
0
18,510
[citation][nom]11796pcs[/nom]Amen is all I can say. If you go to GM, Chrysler, and Ford assembly plants (like the Rouge plant) you would be amazed by how many times you see the UAW emblem- it's to such an extreme that you wonder if the plant is producing Fords or UAWs. UAW jobs are simply rediculous and as soon as GM and Chrysler start to do marginally good again the unions are going to come down hard on both of them and start demanding rediculous terms again. The big three have all been stupid and fat at times and they deserved to be punished when the cheap, dependable, fuel-efficient Hondas and Toyotas started rolling in. But now they're making some fantastic cars (Fusion, HHR, Focus, Cobalt, Cruze, Impala, Volt) and are on the right track.[/citation]

Don't bail out the financial sector or the auto industry and let's let the economy collapse like it did in the 1930's Great Depression. You are very smart !
 

erichoyt

Distinguished
May 24, 2011
4
0
18,510
Analysis red ID think apple will sell 166 million iPhones in 2015.....I would question the validity of their forecasting models.
 

mmm2000

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2011
4
0
18,510
[citation][nom]ReggieRay[/nom]The whole auto bail out scam by the Marxist Obama was to bail out the union, not the company like he told/lied to us. GM did go bankrupt anyway but not until Obozo ruined the shareholders and gave it to his union thug buddies.Unions are nothing but a money laundering scheme for the Marxist, I mean Democrat party.[/citation]

Ooops... Wrong citation in my previous post.

Don't bail out the financial sector or the auto industry and let's let the economy collapse like it did in the 1930's Great Depression. You are very smart !
 

alyon

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2009
22
0
18,560
Just FYI. No american companies trust the chinese in making any part that would put the safety of the customer at risk.

That is the quality the chinese provide. Most companies will outsource easy to manufacture parts. Because most electronics don't put the consumer at risk (just pisses them off) we will still see most of these products not produced in the US.

And yes, employers hate unions. Something about paying someone double what their knowledge and skill provides is just stupid. UAW was probably the worst example of this. I have an uncle in the PGE union and he gets away with so much shit and gets overpiad to hell and back.
 

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
550
0
18,930
[citation][nom]alyon[/nom]Just FYI. No american companies trust the chinese in making any part that would put the safety of the customer at risk. That is the quality the chinese provide. Most companies will outsource easy to manufacture parts. Because most electronics don't put the consumer at risk (just pisses them off) we will still see most of these products not produced in the US.And yes, employers hate unions. Something about paying someone double what their knowledge and skill provides is just stupid. UAW was probably the worst example of this. I have an uncle in the PGE union and he gets away with so much shit and gets overpiad to hell and back.[/citation]

What most people don't seem to realize is that the Chinese factories just produces items to the specifications usually made by the company who orders it. Whats at blame when it comes to quality is that the company who ordered the item wanted it at absolute minimum cost and cut corners. If a product is however engineered in China its another matter. Most "crap" items you purchase with "Made in China" is only build to a crap spec dictated by the company who engineered it. I don't blame the Chinese for building a item according to whats ordered!

Its like order a hamburger without anything and then complain you didn't get a tasty meal...
 

gamerk316

Distinguished
Jul 8, 2008
325
0
19,060
Ford Motor Company closed the Norfolk, Va assembly plant because they were "forced" to pay employees $32 - $58 per hour, depending on job, plus provide health, dental, vision and disability (short and long term) as well as accidental death insurance

No, they AGREED to pay those wages with the Union. Ford was (and still is) free to force new agreements once its contract expires. So don't blame the Union if Ford was willing to overpay for labor peace.
 

alyon

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2009
22
0
18,560
To be fair the union vs management went from, "very strong man playing tug of war with a weaker man" to what it has been for well over a decade at "very strong man playing tug of war with his wife." He is put into a lose lose situation. Either he let's her win and maybe has sex that night or he wins and has guarenteed no sex.

That's what's wrong. It is and has been not balanced and the wage payer should always have more power.
 

morstern

Distinguished
Feb 4, 2011
8
0
18,510
Um... hijacked thread?

I'll play - Poor management, products and weak vision lost the big three their position in the world. factcheck.org has a good post with a link to some more background information. A Toyota plant in the U.S. averaged more than UAW plants. Honda plants were less than a dollar behind. Those figures were after being combined with profit bonuses.

UAW is not without a burden... but you can't lose against the social markets of europe (VW, BMW, etc) and blame your half-ass union as the reason.

===
I wish microsoft could manage something like apple... 3 years and the stocks are still flat. Steve needs to go.
 

alyon

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2009
22
0
18,560
Honda plants are successful due to their culture and how they reward employees in addition to each employee having much more control and personal responsibility. There is a documentary on it. Unionized UAW employees in comparison are entitled brats who whine and do poor work.

UAW was worse that european auto manufacture unions... VWs are also terrible cars. BMWs and Audis are nice but you never own one beyond its warranty if you can... for a good reason... they don't last.

Apple and microsoft are not comparable companies. Apple goes after a niche and is known for mostly hardware while microsoft goes after everyone with mostly software. They really don't have too much overlap and a majority of microsofts market isn't in this apple niche.
 

dgingeri

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2009
175
0
18,640
Well, yeah, that's because Foxconn isn't used to building anything except low quality crap. I'm not saying Apple stuff is high quality, but it's far better than the usual stuff that comes from Foxconn.
 

puggle man

Distinguished
Jun 16, 2010
10
0
18,560
Everyone is missing one point, which is that the high-up corporate people at GM/Ford/Chrysler are still making millions of dollars a year for jobs which are not really too much more difficult (if any) from those of the assembly line workers. This is what i see wrong with capitalism, that those who make it to the top by either skill or luck just say "fuck you guys, i deserve this" and everyone just accepts that. While $75k a year for working on an assembly line might still be a bit much, don't forget that these guys aren't exactly the fat cats here. I bet that if companies would pay every employee a more even wage, say no more than $250k a year for the very top and no less than $40k at the bottom, than we could expect to see a return in jobs and reasonable prices. Not that i expect anything like that would ever happen, because there is no incentive for those who would be able to make that kind of a change.

Don't tell me that communal businesses don't work either, because they can, as long as rules are kept in place to prevent corruption. It isn't really that complicated.
 

alyon

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2009
22
0
18,560
Puggle man, CEOs for companies this large are few and far between. Their pay is so high because their responsibilities are 100x more important, risky, and potentially dangerous. The captain of the ship is always burdened with the most responsibility. Not only that but companies are in fierce competition to attract the best and brightest by monetary compensation.

In addition, I would doubt you could find an assembly work who is on the hook 168 hour a week. You pretty much live, eat, and sleep your job. Most normal weeks are around 80-90 hours just at the office. There is not much time off for some one responsible for a gigantic multi
national corporation.

So how again are these remotely comparable? Besides being in the same boat?
 

alidan

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2009
1,681
0
19,730
[citation][nom]The Greater Good[/nom]I really wish manufacturing jobs would come back to the US. Yes, things would cost more (the only downside... but jobs would be created meaning more tax revenue and people spending their paychecks on goods and services. That leads to more jobs being created and thus continuing the process.[/citation]

the iphone costs 27$ to assemble, and is 180 in parts alone, correct?

how much more would it cost to assemble in america, on a per phone basis? 10-20$ more?

apple sells the cheapest ones at what 400-500$

they could eat the cost if they wanted to and still pull a massive profit, and on top of that, get tremendous amounts of pr for bringing back american manufacturing.

but they probably cant police a factory in america like they can in china.

[citation][nom]scuba dave[/nom]Yes, building something with quality in mind is very difficult compared to the normal, subpar crap that comes out of china and the like.[/citation]

if you want it made good they will make it good, if you want it cheap they will cut corners. and its a fact that most people outsource to china to cut a corner.

[citation][nom]macewrox[/nom]Unless we get rid of unions for good, business will never bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA. Companies are not going to pay people $32 an hour plus health benefits to work an assembly line job.Unions had their uses back in the days of big business, but now they're killing industry.[/citation]

actually, an assembly line job is more like 10-15$ an hour. and benefits very from company to company. unions suck, but its not a black and white issue, especially considering that id a operation could pay you less than minimum wage, they would, they only pay you more when competition will pay you more too. some jobs, like electricians DESERVE more money because of how inherently dangerous that job is and how good it needs to be done. and good teachers also deserve a hell of allot more than they get.

[citation][nom]rotsae[/nom]If all they ever make was crap and the product break so fast, why do you guys still buy them. And before you say you are one of those people that don't buy anything made in China. Take one minute and look around you. Yes it shocking how stupid you are. I am stupid too because I am trying to telling people to not be a bias a-hole on the internet. Silly me.[/citation]

i PERSONALLY research if a product is good or not before i buy them. like my sd card, kingston japan makes higher quality cards than any other section, so i bought mine from there. i also have some china made things but they are all good products. generic china made things, do tend to break sooner than anywhere else though, because they do cut corners.

[citation][nom]jgalecio[/nom]No homey why screw China? Its Apples gay ass that decided to send American jobs over seas for cheaper production. So please don't go blaming people who, just like us Americans, are trying to live and feed a family and keep a dream. Its greedy ass corporate American that should be black balled for sending jobs outside the US while American people get screwed with low paying jobs and unemployment. Because heaven forbid if a company assembled their products here and it cost $400 to make rather than $80 and only make a $200+ profit rather than a $600+ profit...[/citation]

if those numbers were anywhere near close, than i would be with corporate side, but they arent. at most it would cost another 20-40$ an ipod/pad

[citation][nom]K2N hater[/nom]Without unions you'd be working for 16h a day and earn less than half... Just like in China.[/citation]

no.... you wouldn't. you would work cheaper, but not butt@#$@ cheaper. people who work non union tend to make more money than union, however if they get benefits and job security is another question altogether.

[citation][nom]sykozis[/nom]Unions bankrupted General Motors and Chrysler both...as well as poor management of both companies.Ford Motor Company closed the Norfolk, Va assembly plant because they were "forced" to pay employees $32 - $58 per hour, depending on job, plus provide health, dental, vision and disability (short and long term) as well as accidental death insurance. GM has been "forced" to provide their employees with the same benefits....which cost into the billions. Plus GM pays retired employees their full salary + raises as "forced" by the UAW. Unions use forms of extortion to get what they want.....funny, Extortion is against US law.....but Unions are permitted to openly commit to it. Companies are permitted to have "anti-union" policies.....but they're required to be "closed-door" policies, meaning they can't require a "non-union agreement", nor can they request that you sign one at any point. In "right to work" states, you can actually be fired for joining a union or attempting to form a union, so long as that isn't stated as the reason for termination.[/citation]

that couldnt have anything to do with the recession, and the fact cars are made so good that they can last 20+ years without any SERIOUS (costs more then buying a new car) money needing to be put into them.

and those per hours you quoted, aren't assembly line hour wages, those are electrician wages. and death insurance, even without union, a wrongfull death could easily cost more than the insurance.

[citation][nom]greenrider02[/nom]If GM was making quality vehicles that they could sell for a reasonable price, then they wouldn't have had to file for bankruptcy, the union situation hasn't changed.. the managment has, because now they're selling better cars for better prices and actually making money.The problem was that US automakers thought they could just cruise along while foreign competitors kept innovating and making better cars... so blame the unions if you want, but try to look at some other factors too[/citation]

made in america doesnt mean anything when you charge such a high premium for it and it a well made foreign car can be built as good and sold cheaper (obscenely cheaper, like if unions didn't exist, and we @#$@ emploies on pay, they still wouldn't be cheaper)

[citation][nom]macewrox[/nom]Yes. And now that laws are set for all of those sorts of problems (Because of unions) their cause is moot.They have no reason to exist right now except for the blue collar worker's greed. If you want to make $32 an hour, go to college, or learn a real trade or profession.[/citation]

don't non union jobs also pay minimum wage, and force you to work harder than most union jobs, because they can? also didnt some non union emplyers not pay overtime, while forcing emploies to work 80 hour shifts (ea a few years back, mcdonalds today, and also walmart has had these problems). unions force corpreate greed back.

and so you know what i mean about corporate greed, mcdonalds gave out such big bonuses one year to the hq emploies, that if they shared the wealth, they could have more than doubled what people who work there are payed. (as in in the 30-40$ range) and they get away with that crap because we preceve the people working there are kids (what sick @$#^ that we think its ok to @$#% kids over on jobs) when most of the people working there are adults who have no other options. also, they forced unpayed overtime on people durring rush hours, and if you left like you are legally allowed to, you can kiss your job good by because they will find someone who would work unpayed to keep the job.

[citation][nom]mmm2000[/nom]And the iPad will cost you $2000 instead of $500 ![/citation]

no, but yes at the same time, the made in america lable would be enough for apple to justify a price hike even if they still would pull a profit.


[citation][nom]gamerk316[/nom]No, they AGREED to pay those wages with the Union. Ford was (and still is) free to force new agreements once its contract expires. So don't blame the Union if Ford was willing to overpay for labor peace.[/citation]

agree to pay us this or we strike...
you kind of see why they payed that much, but like i said, there is no why that assembly line prices.

[citation][nom]alyon[/nom]To be fair the union vs management went from, "very strong man playing tug of war with a weaker man" to what it has been for well over a decade at "very strong man playing tug of war with his wife." He is put into a lose lose situation. Either he let's her win and maybe has sex that night or he wins and has guarenteed no sex.That's what's wrong. It is and has been not balanced and the wage payer should always have more power.[/citation]

wage payer should have no power once they go corporate, look at what most corporations do and you can see why.

 

alyon

Distinguished
Nov 17, 2009
22
0
18,560
People who work at McDonalds are not kids. They are just uterly skill less and easily replacable. They put no effort in making themselves unique and demanded by an employer and are treated as such.

I also agree than not all unions are bad. There are just too many really bad ones that make it easy to overlook the good ones.

Also, I don't see people complaining about athletes, actors, and musicians making too much money but when it comes to a talented manager or CEO (which are just as rare) people put them on the cross.
 

Kamab

Distinguished
Aug 16, 2010
113
0
18,640
Not all unions are bad and not all bad unions are 100% bad. I just wish unions had some incentive to get rid of members that suck. I'm looking at you teacher's unions. (and some construction unions).
 

nebun

Distinguished
Oct 20, 2008
1,160
0
19,240
[citation][nom]scuba dave[/nom]Yes, building something with quality in mind is very difficult compared to the normal, subpar crap that comes out of china and the like.[/citation]
very true
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
774
0
18,940
[citation][nom]macewrox[/nom]Unless we get rid of unions for good, business will never bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA. Companies are not going to pay people $32 an hour plus health benefits to work an assembly line job.Unions had their uses back in the days of big business, but now they're killing industry.[/citation]
i'll argue just the opposite because current policy allows manufacturers to leave the usa and in fact promotes it as well as congress forcing america to move away from a manufacturing base since the end of WW2, it was blatanly stated by american leadership at the end of the second world war. todays conditions mimic those of the robber baron days, everybody giving their all just to fight for a job and the minute you screw up you're replaced immediately. if you're not fighting to keep your job right now it's because there is little competition in your field and consider yourself lucky. i know a great deal of people who've had 8-12+ jobs in the last 2 years that used to be in manufacturing and the company either moves overseas or goes out of business or is laying off half their staff just to keep the company afloat or at the same profit margin.
americans are being lied to and it doesn't help when it's the leadership lying to it's other half and the people all for the benefit of the the ones who own the companies or run them.
you want to fix america:

end nafta with mexico and PNTR with china.
http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/briefingpapers_pntr_china/
 

alexmx

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2009
37
0
18,580
Lol, you thumbed me down because I wrote that those products would be even pricier if they were made in the US?

Oh boy!

Chinese workers earn maximum 300 USD per month and you expect that the price hike for using a minimum wage US worker would be only 40-50 USD? Open your eyes people.

There should be some serious productivity increment for compensating such wages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.