Home Theater: Sound Bar Round Up

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
Should have included yamaha's sound projector in the review. They are the king of the mountain for sound bar/sound projector
 

BlackPearl

Distinguished
May 31, 2008
1
0
18,510
The Boston Acoustics soundbar with its "fantastic, full-range sound quality unmatched by the other competitors" is gets next to last place because it doesn't do fake surround?
 

tuanies

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2010
3
0
18,510
@rpgplayer the score in the conclusion is correct. Thanks for pointing that out, we've fixed it.

@BlackPearl - we've fixed the math, the Boston and Vizio should be tied.
 

tuanies

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2010
3
0
18,510
We were focusing on new sub-$500 sound bars. The cheapest Yamaha sound projector starts at $1400 while the Air Surround YAS-71 starts at $600.
 
G

Guest

Guest
When you do get around to the higher-end bars, please try to include a Niro system. The sound quality is fantastic.
 

jeroly

Distinguished
Jun 27, 2007
12
0
18,560
I'm definitely with BlackPearl on this one. This has to be the STUPIDEST review I've ever seen on Tom's. The most important quality of a speaker is sound quality, and it's given equal weight with the least important quality. Moreover, I have to question any review of any feature of a Sony product that gives it high marks as I haven't seen a high-quality Sony product in about 20 years including the ones I've been fooled into buying.
 

tuanies

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2010
3
0
18,510
Usually I would agree with you, but the target market for the sound bars are not audiophiles and just your average end user who wants to use it to watch TV and movies.

Yes they can spend a lot of money on a high-end system, but not everyone can have a 5.1 system or desire to run the wires associated with it. The sound bars present an alternative, that improves sound for the tasks they desire.

The Boston excels in audio quality, which is why we gave it 5's across the board. The Sony is just a better all-in-one solution that does everything.

And in the end it is all about value, all the sound bars in the round up are sub-$500, and the Sony can even be had for under $350. When you want convenience, features with a huge improvement over TV speakers with little hassle, you can't really go wrong with a sound bar.
 

noware

Distinguished
Sep 29, 2009
3
0
18,510
I normally don't comment on these things BUT you should have had a ZVOX unit or two in the review. They have a few that are under $500 and would blow the sound quality and surround function of any of the reviewed items out of theater. I'm talking first hand seeing as I have compared the ZVOX and a Vizio unit and there is no comparison. Save your self some time and just buy a ZVOX. Real speakers in a real wood enclosure for real sound.
 

noware

Distinguished
Sep 29, 2009
3
0
18,510
I normally don't comment on these things BUT you should have had a ZVOX unit or two in the review. They have a few that are under $500 and would blow the sound quality and surround function of any of the reviewed items out of theater. I'm talking first hand seeing as I have compared the ZVOX and a Vizio unit and there is no comparison. Save your self some time and just buy a ZVOX. Real speakers in a real wood enclosure for real sound.
 

GearUp

Distinguished
Feb 19, 2010
28
0
18,580
Unless space is a consideration, a real 2.0 or 2.1 system at this cost would be better. Extra speakers and connectivity have increased real costs so add $200 to what you spent for a receiver 20 years ago. Otherwise you get one offering 2-room capability that can't do it.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Agreed on Zvox, makes the article a "don't bother reading" piece when they miss the best bang-for-the-buck on the market. I own Bose and Zvox and, while Bose is great, the latter is the better value by far.

I recommend Zvox to everyone I know.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I just want a review on the Panasonic SC-HTB10. Thought that was what I was supposed to get here?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.