[citation][nom]halcyon[/nom]Some think that Apple didn't necessarily invent the smartphone...that Apple just made it enjoyable and useful. I know there was the Palm Treo and the whatchamacallit phone before the iPhone...for some reason some people think the iPhone made the technologies you listed more usable. I can't imagine why anyone would think this though.[/citation]
iphone would have been as big a failure if it wanst for the ipod.
[citation][nom]Verrin[/nom]I'm still waiting for an ICS QWERTY phone to replace my Galaxy Ace. I wouldn't mind something like the Galaxy S Glide, but it's still missing some key hardware features I'm looking for (that and I don't want to have to deal with Rogers to get it). But with this move from HTC, I'm guaranteed to never be their customer ever again. My dream phone just doesn't exist right now. I think touch screens are a good way to input some form of data, but not all. They aren't suited for typing or high speed input. It's like the difference between an analog stick and a d-pad-- you can usually accomplish the same kind of functionality with the d-pad, but if you want precision and accuracy, you're going to opt for the analog stick. And I prefer the touchscreen for other forms of input, just not typing.[/citation]
with the dpad... you could make it pressure sensitive with a 15% dead zone on the top and bottom of the pressure scales, and probably get as good of precision as the analogue sticks... and probably better... i cant tell you how often controllers need to be replaced because of thumbs getting loose, or rubber grip being rubbed away, or fingers slipping off, they cant do that with a dpad. hell if you had a pressure sensitive 8 way d pad, i dont think analogue could match that... at least with how small they currently are.