Okay, this article bothers me quite a bit.
Just yesterday, for some unknown reason, I was pushed a months old story by this same author who was shocked to learn that 110v home charging for an EV was slow.
Now today this pops up, and it's pretty clear author John Velasco isn't just misinformed or lazy, he has an agenda.
Serious question, why is a guy who reviews cell phones also qualified to review cars? Especially when at best he exhibits almost zero knowledge on the topic. Hopefully Kia and other manufacturers stop offering Tom's Guide cars to review, because the John's reviews are an obvious mix of disingenuous and cherry-picked misinformation meant as fuel for the mouth breathers in the anti-EV gang.
I'd say 'stick to reviewing phones' but after reading John's other articles it's clear he's either willfully ignorant or not honest. Not great. I wouldn't trust his phone reviews either.
Edit: Last thought...my cost to charge at home is ~0.11 cents per kwh when charging off-peak. Going from 0 to 100% would cost me $11 and give me 275miles of range while driving a car that faster, quieter, and more reliable than any ICE vehicle I've ever owned. Not no mention no oil changes, no transmission flushes, no belts to change at 80k miles, etc.