after the big flop that was MW2 for PC I think this would be a little better.But again, there could always get worse, too, a success like MW1 did not forecast the failure of MW2. I will take any predictions with a grain of salt.I am talking PC gamers here; console fans can draw their own conclusions. You really don't get it MW2 is well optimized, a game like GTA 4 were almost nothing can play it smoothly isn't. A 4850 can max MW2 and MW2 looks amazing.2. Lean hurts balance because it allows campers to be harder to see, which only aides campers. Either way the impact on gameplay is minimal and it is a non-issue.3. Have you played it? Probably not. There are plenty of mods, I've met them. Your right no servers, but definitely no host advantage. The host can't change settings nearly as much as you would think, also the host tends to lag the most in MW2 so where are the advantages?4. So because YOU think it is an inferior game to the original, an extra $10 (which makes you pay the same as everyone else), is not worth it. Well that is a value judgment and that is up to you, but your opinion is not fact and does not constitute as what is, isn't, or should, shouldn't be.I'm not arguing that it would be better to have dedicated servers, or that the extra $10, while not huge deal, was a bit of an a-hole move,(I do argue the lean point though). I'm arguing that the game is not inferior on the PC, it just doesn't get the special attention some would like. The bottom line? It is still a great game that sells well, gets excellent reviews, and harbors an excellent community, yes even on the PC!
1. Yeah, I know a 4850 can max it, it's because the game was designed for Xbox 360