Invisible Dresses Coming Soon

[alextheblue]

[citation][nom]teodoreh[/nom]Hey, I've found a usage for ATi multi-output VGAs! ps. Wearing an ATI 5xxxx VGA. The 'He's hot' phrase will have a brand new meaning!!![/citation]No, you're thinking of Nvidia's upcoming Quad Fermi card. It's 3 feet long and doubles as a toaster.

 

[JonnyDough]

Sensationalist headlines at their finest. Proves once again its all about the webhits.

 

[demonhorde665]

[citation][nom]webbwbb[/nom]The biggest problem they will have is contrast. No screen or pigmentation is able to get to the level of darkness that shadows produce. In addition to that, they will need at least 5 cameras from each angle they want to project just to get a kind of close contrast level. Immagine looking down a street and seeing a "silhouette" of a person that has rough edges and doesn't really fit with the colors around it. It may sort of work but will not be able to work really well.Actually another possible problem I just thought of is focus. The person or object that is being hidden may be in focus at some distances but will not likely be focused at others.[/citation]


i'll say to your comment but this really goes for several commentors. Sure the thing will have flaws, but have you ever tried to pick a camoflaged military sniper out in a picture let alone in real life at over 100 yards , it is not easy and most people would be shot before they could begin to figure out the sniper's location .. now imagine this tech built into the same sniper's clothing ... you are talking next to impossible to spot. so even a flawed form of this in use would be a mjor military asset in teh way of camo.

 

[demonhorde665]

[citation][nom]eddieseven[/nom]Should be compulsory for guys to wear trousers that go transparent in nightclubs so the girls don't get deceived by the fakers that pack all manner of vegetation down their pants in order to impress![/citation]
[citation][nom]gm0n3y[/nom]You do realize that you'd be able to see all of their 'packages' right? I mean that's cool if you're into that, I'm just not sure you thought that one all the way through.[/citation]


LOL and Double LOL

 

[demonhorde665]

[citation][nom]lilwillis[/nom]we can only hope for a malfunction at an inopportune moment...[/citation]

LOL i can see the headlines now " Actress __________ has invisiblie dress wardrobe malfunction on live TV - in HD-3D"

 

[cj_online]

[citation][nom]emmeric21[/nom]Why a dress? Why whould a girl want to be invisible ? A guy whould have a million reasons more. You are aiming at the wrong market imo[/citation]
A fashion statement...

 

[SevenVirtues]

Someone made a coat like this YEARS ago, as in sometime around 2000. Can't remember the exact year.

 

[crusty]

[citation][nom]gm0n3y[/nom]So if we can have clothes that display what is behind them, could we have say an HD movie playing on your pants/shirt?[/citation]
Or if a really un attractive chick was wearing it they could project themselves as super hot... Sucks for the guy that goes home with them...

 

[The_Trutherizer]

@cracklint:
Rambo in a dress? 😵