[citation][nom]usersname[/nom]Do some bloody homework! Far, far more PC users pay additional extortion-racket money for rebranded GPU cards than Apple customers do for Mac GPU upgrades (or downgrades actually), because most Macs can't be fiddled with, so there is less opportunity for OEM's to rip off gullible customers who cream their diapers every time their specs suggest an extra fps can be squeezed out of a rig. PC customers are by far the more abused by this system of relentless upgrades. It costs time, resources, waste, $$$'s (and, it would appear, sanity).You think Apple writes its OS for one Mac model? Until recently (10.6) Mac OS had to operate with dozens of legacy machines using different (PPC, x86) CPU's, GPU's, RAM etc., Apple have reduced the number of different machines but there are still quite a few supported Macs and future models to come...all will need supporting. Apple customers pay more for GPU's because the market is smaller not because Apple impose a tax. Despite this, my EVGA285GTX cost just about the same as the PC version. There was about $30.00 difference in price.P.s. I use a Windows 7 Bit PC and a 64Bit Mac (each serves a different function).[/citation]
I am not going to insult you because I dont really care, but first off 10.6 doesnt work with power pc processors, Second those laptops didnt just work when they recalled them, because of overheating. Third, Dozens of hardware platforms. WOW that is amazing, Dozens. Man they are good. Vista worked on hundreds of hardware platforms. It worked on mine, but mine wasnt ten years old either.
Not only that but you list CPU's, Ram, Graphics Cards. Lets see 10.6 works with intel cpu's (not power pc). Ram (all os's work with a bunch of different ram not a big deal) and Graphic cards (Nvidia only though unless ati writes a driver for it.) So good argument there. Apple is a closed system. That is why android will kill the iphone.