LinkedIn's New User Agreement Specifies No Prostitutes

[JMcEntegart]

LinkedIn makes its user agreement a little more clear.

LinkedIn's New User Agreement Specifies No Prostitutes : Read more

 

[pacomac]

Damn, that's just put the dampers on my career change.

 

[mikenygmail]

What, no disappointed big guy pic?

 

[romansky]

So no outsourcers?

 

[JOSHSKORN]

Craigslist needs the Adult Encounter section just to field out the prostitutes.

 

[Ghoul]

🙁

 

[MisterZ]

Typical American prudes.

 

[g-unit1111]

To quote George Carlin: "Prostitution should be legal. Selling is legal, ****ing is legal. So why wouldn't selling ****ing be legal?"

 

[blurr91]

How about an "actress?"

 

[alyssaethan1]

as Elizabeth replied I'm amazed that a mom can earn $7438 in four weeks on the computer. did you see this site go to this site home tab for more detail--->>> HTTP://WWW.JOBS34.COM

 

[gm0n3y]

I don't understand why companies get away with this continued discrimination against escorts. If linked in decided to forbid all actors or Mexicans or left-handed people, there would be many more complaints.

 

[falchard]

Prostitutes need business connections too.