Solved! Looking for some laptop suggstions

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Balthraka

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2010
11
0
18,560
Hey TH people,
I am looking to get myself a new laptop and would like some advice.
Any help would be appreciated!

Basically, what I am looking for is something:
-Moderate size (13 or 14 inch)
-A good battery
-Lightweight (under 2kgs/4.4lbs)
Those are the 3 most important things. I am using this to replace my 9 inch eeepc because I cant deal with the size of it anymore, but weight is still very important because I travel a lot with it (same for the battery).
-Power wise, I think an i3 or i5 would be nice. Not an absolute requirement, but I want something that can be used as my only computer while travelling so it needs some umph. (Will not sacrifice battery or weight for this).


Here are the anwers to the Sticky questions.

1. What is your budget?
No specific budget.
Just looking for the cheapest thing I can get which fits my requirements.

2. What is the size of the notebook that you are considering?
Im thinking 13 inch, but maybe 14 inch.
Somewhere between 13 and 14.

3. What screen resolution do you want?
Unimportant.

4. Do you need a portable or desktop replacement laptop?
See above.

5. How much battery life do you need?
Lots.

6. Do you want to play games with your laptop? If so then please list the games that you want to with the settings that you want for these games. (Low,Medium or High)?
No.

7. What other tasks do you want to do with your laptop? (Photo/Video editing, Etc.)
Word processing
Watching movies
Heavy internet use

8. How much storage (Hard Drive capacity) do you need?
Unimportant

9. If you are considering specific sites to buy from, please post their links.
Nope
Link me to anything

10. How long do you want to keep your laptop?
A number of years.
Have had my eeepc for 4 years now and still use it.

11. What kind of Optical drive do you need? DVD ROM/Writer,Bluray ROM/Writer,Etc ?
Not required.

12. Please tell us about the brands that you prefer to buy from them and the brands that you don't like and explain the reasons.
I like Asus.
But have no reason for that.
So, anything.

13. What country do you live in?
Australia.
But that doesnt matter.

14. Please tell us any additional information if needed.
See top.


Cheers and thanks in advance. :)
Tim
 
Solution
If you are going with ASUS, I suggest the U46E instead of the U36JC because it has a 2nd gen i5 (Sandy Bridge) in there and is slightly faster.

The Nvidia 310m in the U36JC is really weak and not convincingly better than the integrated HD 3000 in the Sandy Bridge. The Nvidia 310m is just a waste of battery.

Also, U46E has a dvd drive.

The best part is that the U46E doesn't seem to cost more.

Aeir

Distinguished
Sep 26, 2011
21
0
18,570
The Zenbook also has a multitouch trackpad, though. And just as much, if not more (depending on which models you're comparing) storage. Where did you see that the Airs have 3x more? USB 3.0 will likely be far more useful,, in general than a thunderbolt port. Competition is good for the consumer, though. ^ ^
 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
^+1 @Aeir

USB 3.0 is way more common and many other laptop have multitouch touchpad. When will Apple take that comment down for their ads?

Although the Lenovo is still going to kill both in battery with removable 9cell battery plus expansion battery tray to give it up to 24 Hrs of run time.
 

Balthraka

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2010
11
0
18,560


I also wouldn't be buying it from the manufacturur.
Anyway. Let's stop worrying about me buying it and actually find a laptop that fits my requirements.


Altough its not popular on this forum, I recommend the Apple Macbook Air. Its the only notebook computer I would buy today if I had to.

Given the fact that you will not play games on it, its a perfect choice. There is no other notebook out there that can compete with its small form factor and features. Its ultra portable, its ALL SSD, includes a full back-lit keyboard and an insane battery life. It also has the multi-touch trackpad, wich makes other notebooks look from last century.

You can also check the Sony Vaio, they have some crazy designs, it may be interesting to you.

To be honest.
Apple and Sony are probably the 2 brands that I would automatically shy away from.
It seems to me that they are the 2 where you pay for brand and not content. Like, a comparable non Apple or Sony is generally heaps cheaper...

I may be wrong though...

Leandro: actually, the Macbook air is pretty much specifically what the new Asus Ultrabooks are going to be competing with. I don't think that they have a backlit keyboard (I haven't looked), but beyond that, they're on par if not better in more categories, and have a higher resolution in the 13" model than the equivalent macbook air. I had a site up on my other computer specifically comparing the two side-by-side in chart format when I was looking at them last night. And better yet, the Zenbooks aren't a Mac.

I am happy with this release from Asus, cause it will force Apple to make even more competivie Airs, but the Airs do offer 3x times more SSD storage and also thunderbolt ports, wich will be compatible with external gaming videocards in development. The Asus has a USB 3.0 port instead, perhaps a better option today.

And in addition, the Air has a multi-touch trackpad, thats an awesome exclusive feature wich makes you work 500% times faster and eliminates the use of a mouse.

The Zenbook also has a multitouch trackpad, though. And just as much, if not more (depending on which models you're comparing) storage. Where did you see that the Airs have 3x more? USB 3.0 will likely be far more useful,, in general than a thunderbolt port. Competition is good for the consumer, though. ^ ^

^+1 @Aeir

USB 3.0 is way more common and many other laptop have multitouch touchpad. When will Apple take that comment down for their ads?

Although the Lenovo is still going to kill both in battery with removable 9cell battery plus expansion battery tray to give it up to 24 Hrs of run time.

So, do we all really think that a computer that is not actually out yet is the only thing which fits my needs?
Surely someone else has needed something like this in the past.

Cheers
Tim

 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
If you are going with ASUS, I suggest the U46E instead of the U36JC because it has a 2nd gen i5 (Sandy Bridge) in there and is slightly faster.

The Nvidia 310m in the U36JC is really weak and not convincingly better than the integrated HD 3000 in the Sandy Bridge. The Nvidia 310m is just a waste of battery.

Also, U46E has a dvd drive.

The best part is that the U46E doesn't seem to cost more.
 
Solution

jolen

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2011
3
0
18,510
I am also currently looking for a lightweight laptop. As of now my best pick is ASUS U36SD, but I'm still looking for other options. My deadline is on end of November, so if nothing new comes up, I'll probably go with it.

AFAIK, The only difference with U36SD and U36JC (the one you have mentioned) is that U36SD uses the newer sandy bridge processor, maximum RAM capacity and speed, and the GPU.

I'm actually waiting for the availability and prices of the upcoming ultrabooks, but if it can't meet my deadline and/or budget then that's it.

You can also check Samsung NP900X3A. I think this is the most available ultrabook as of now. I also like it but my budget wasn't able to reach it. ^_^
 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
I think the Samsung 9 series is just too expensive for Balthraka.

As for you jolen, the Samsung 9 series and the ASUS U36SD is laptop of different class. The U36SD is going to eat the Samsung alive in performance. I don't see what justify the significant higher cost of the Samsung laptop.
 

leandrodafontoura

Distinguished
Sep 26, 2006
54
0
18,590
To be honest, I wouldnt buy any computer today from any manufacturerer, Sony, dell, apple, asus, whatever... they were so much better 3 years ago, in comparison to what was available in the market. Im waiting for notebooks to go SSD. Apple Air is 64gb only, Im talkin about 500GB.

I just said that if I HAD to buy a notebook today, it would be Apple air cause its SSD and extremely portable, Asus doesnt exist yet
 

jolen

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2011
3
0
18,510
As for you jolen, the Samsung 9 series and the ASUS U36SD is laptop of different class. The U36SD is going to eat the Samsung alive in performance. I don't see what justify the significant higher cost of the Samsung laptop.

I don't wanna steal the thread to the OP so I didn't mention my specification but we almost have the same specs anyway ;) .

For me, I am just looking for a lightweight, good build quality, a little bit of beauty (which is in the eye of the beholder, for me, it's thin :D ), a budget of 1K USD (1.2K if it's SSD, since I'm planning to change it to SSD if it doesn't - 120GB is enough for me, I just hope it's possible, is it?), and finally not a MAC (no offense meant, it's just my own preference).

So performance is actually not much an issue for me except for the SSD. Battery life is also not important to me (I'll probably plugging it in most of the time) compared to what the OP needs. I actually have thought about MSI X370 (which only has AMD E-350 CPU) but I think the build quality is quite bad (can someone confirm this?).

I'm also thinking about ASUS U31SD, but its build quality is not as good as U36SD but the price difference is not that much, so I think it's not worth it. What do you think? I haven't seen any of this personally so my basis is just from the reviews I read and watch.

I just said that if I HAD to buy a notebook today, it would be Apple air cause its SSD and extremely portable, Asus doesnt exist yet

I did found an ASUS U36SD that has 160GB of SSD (version RX114V). But the specification from ASUS website didn't have it, so I'm not really sure :p .
 

Balthraka

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2010
11
0
18,560
If you are going with ASUS, I suggest the U46E instead of the U36JC because it has a 2nd gen i5 (Sandy Bridge) in there and is slightly faster.

The Nvidia 310m in the U36JC is really weak and not convincingly better than the integrated HD 3000 in the Sandy Bridge. The Nvidia 310m is just a waste of battery.

Also, U46E has a dvd drive.

The best part is that the U46E doesn't seem to cost more.

I am not necessarily going with Asus.
I am just looking for options! And I was only getting one from so I thought I would throw out something I found and see people's opinions...
I DONT CARE about the brand or where it is available (I just prefer not Apple or Sony for reasons above).

As for the 46UE.
I cant seem to find a reliable weight for it.
At 14" and with a DVD drive surely it wont fall into the under 2kg (4.4lb) category. Anyone know?

Oh, and the DVD drive isnt a selling point.
Can happily take it or leave it.

I am also currently looking for a lightweight laptop. As of now my best pick is ASUS U36SD, but I'm still looking for other options. My deadline is on end of November, so if nothing new comes up, I'll probably go with it.

AFAIK, The only difference with U36SD and U36JC (the one you have mentioned) is that U36SD uses the newer sandy bridge processor, maximum RAM capacity and speed, and the GPU.

I'm actually waiting for the availability and prices of the upcoming ultrabooks, but if it can't meet my deadline and/or budget then that's it.

You can also check Samsung NP900X3A. I think this is the most available ultrabook as of now. I also like it but my budget wasn't able to reach it. ^_^

Thanks for the Asus suggestion. That's a good thought.
Do the SandyBridge processors use more battery though? From what Im reading they are not the low power ones like on the 36JC (and would presumably then use more power).
No?

Samsung looks nice.
A little expensive considering what's out there though.

Take a look at dell.com too
Any particular computer?

I think the Samsung 9 series is just too expensive for Balthraka.
While not true, I just think there are cheaper options that perform equally well.

To be honest, I wouldnt buy any computer today from any manufacturerer, Sony, dell, apple, asus, whatever... they were so much better 3 years ago, in comparison to what was available in the market. Im waiting for notebooks to go SSD. Apple Air is 64gb only, Im talkin about 500GB.

I just said that if I HAD to buy a notebook today, it would be Apple air cause its SSD and extremely portable, Asus doesnt exist yet

Interesting opinion...

---------------

Cheers
Tim
 

billj214

Distinguished
Jan 27, 2009
24
0
18,560
I just got a Lenovo T420 and it's very basic but absolutely a powerhouse, light and excellent battery life.

Just a note to notebook buyers, the Intel brand wireless/Lan network card performance is worth every penny compared to cheaper network chips like Realtek, it picks up weak signals my friends can't even detect.

Core i5 2410m
Intel SSD X25-m 80g
No DVD
Standard battery = 8hrs
Cost $750
 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
@leandrodafontoura

SSD or not, it is not the most important in laptop specification. You can always buy one and put it in a laptop if you want better HDD performance. However, for cpu and especially the gpu, you want to think carefully before getting a laptop because changing cpu is considerably more difficult and gpu is almost always impossible to change afterward.

@jolen

I don't think MSI is bad. Their quality range from excellent to average. A truly bad company would have been out of the competition by now.

As to chassis quality, I don't think you can break them by sudden exertion of force before the HDD or the actual screen break. So if you are not a violent user, even plastic chassis last for years.

@Balthraka
The weight is 2.08kg for the U46E. No, the U36JC use Arrandale standard voltage cpu. U46E use Sandy Bridge standard voltage, which is faster clock for clock.

There are other similar options out there from another brand. In fact, you have so many choice, it is hard to go through every single one. I am just picking the brand I am familiar with and is known for good quality for generally every line of their product.

Ignore the laptop was better 3 years ago comment. Laptop is definitely better now than 3 years ago because of the competition. Now you see more design with ssd, alloy/metal chassis and switchable graphics which you don't have back then.

Other laptop that I think will suit your purpose includes HP EliteBook, Dell Vostro, Toshiba Satellite Pro etc. But I am not familiar with them so I couldn't make a recommendation.


 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
Have to agree with billj214 on Lenovo's battery life. Also ThinkPad serie's chassis are really solid.

My pick is still Lenovo ThinkPad x220, based on good performance for your purpose, excellent battery life, solid quality and reasonable price.
 

jolen

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2011
3
0
18,510
After looking from your suggestions, I narrowed my selection to ASUS U36SD, Toshiba Portege R83x, and Lenovo T420. :D

Although Pyree's pick (Lenovo x220) is actually better than Lenovo T420, I didn't select it because it only offers 12.5", so it didn't pass my criteria to have 13-14" (which I forgot to mention but the OP did mention it). I don't know if Balthraka will be fine with it, but for me, I think I really need the little difference. I actually want 14" but most lightweight laptops are smaller, so I came to accept 13.3 but not any smaller than it anymore. :)

Here are some of (external) specs/price comparson:
Asus and Toshiba is both 13.3", Lenovo is 14"
Asus and Toshiba's price doesn't differ much (~800-900 USD), Lenovo is a bit expensive (~1000-1200 USD)
Toshiba is the lightest (3.2Kg), Lenovo (3.68Kg), Asus (3.74Kg)
Asus is thinnest (0.76"), Lenovo (1.02"), Toshiba (1.05")

For Balthraka, I think, I'll probably suggest Lenovo as well, (as billj214 suggested) because of its battery life where I think is very important to him (but not for me). I actually don't really know how's the battery life of the other two compares to it, but so far both billj214 and Pyree vouch for its great battery life. You can actually go with x220 (as Pyree suggested) if you could live up with its 12.5" size ;)

But for me, I actually should have easily remove Lenovo from the list because of it's higher price but because of it's 14" size that I kept it in the competition. But in the end the looks sealed the win for me and it still goes to ASUS U36SD (where this is already a personal viewpoint) :sol:

Please keep suggestions coming if there are still other good choices that hasn't been mentioned. :hello:
 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
@jolen

I would suggest ASUS K43SA or SV,. They are better in the graphics department than U36SD. Should get at least a GT540 for graphics if you want to game. But on you may find it a bit too thick and you may not need the extra graphics power for games.
 

billj214

Distinguished
Jan 27, 2009
24
0
18,560
Yes the Lenovo is very solid, as for the SSD it is very important for notebooks due to battery life.
My buddy has the X220 which at the time I wish I had bought but his battery life is about 1/3 less than mine!
 

Pyree

Distinguished
Moderator
I have an SSD on my laptop but I didn't know how much battery it save because I didn't replace the HDD with it. I put it in there as a boot and program disk along with the HDD for storage in a 2 HDD configuration. The SSD reduce the 2 hrs battery life to 1:40 on a full charge.

Thank you billj214 for your experience on how much battery SSD can save.
 

TRENDING THREADS