My vote for all-time worst recording of a holiday song

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Doc wrote:

> Okay, there's someone I prefer Sinatra to. Isn't there some law against
> doing what Stewart did to the standards?
>
>

Nah. As long as they be payin', he be singin'.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

I like this one:

Our Unabashed Dictionary defines "Fanny: in the U.S. to be the
hindmost part. In England, however, it's the part most Hynde."
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

Doc wrote:

> Yeah, Goulet recorded a lot of schlock and I've heard could be a horse's
> ass, but he had a formidable vocal instrument. "If Ever I Would Leave You"
> was a gem. Haven't heard him in a long time, don't know what kind of shape
> his pipes are in these days.

He could not swing his way into a wet paper shopping bag. You seem
oblivious to the implications of phrasing.

--
ha
 

Doc

Distinguished
Jan 11, 2003
131
0
18,630
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"hank alrich" <walkinay@thegrid.net> wrote in message
news:1gpijfs.al2epo1ro5u5fN%walkinay@thegrid.net...
> Doc wrote:
>
> > Yeah, Goulet recorded a lot of schlock and I've heard could be a horse's
> > ass, but he had a formidable vocal instrument.

> He could not swing his way into a wet paper shopping bag.

Whether that's true or not, as a vocalist he was in a class Sinatra couldn't
even dream of aspiring to. As were any of the others I noted.

> You seem
> oblivious to the implications of phrasing.

The "implications" of phrasing? Holy inappropriate word usage Batman! I
assume you mean the technique of phrasing. Or simply "phrasing".

Having played lead trumpet in a number of big bands and having done some
arranging and songwriting, I'm reasonably familiar with concepts such as
swing, phrasing etc.

I've found that when people say "he's got great phrasing" it often means
their vocal chops are shot.

If you think Sinatra was great, knock yerself out and enjoy. I won't be
joining you in your adulation.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:44:20 GMT, "Doc" <docsavage20@xhotmail.com>
wrote:

>His fellow Rat-Packer Sammy Davis had more singing talent in his glass eye
>than Sinatra ever dreamed of. <snip>

Agreed.

>Dunno about that but I think he was overrated as a singer. <snip>

Even Astaire said he couldn't sing!

>Sorry, I've never gotten excited about Sinatra, even in his so-called prime.
>Anything after about the mid 50's I find unlistenable. He was the most
>slickly packaged singer of his era but far from the most talented. <snip>

Well, to be fair, his Dorsey days showed he COULD sell a song, as
witnessed by the mobs at the Brooklyn Paramount would attest, but by
'49 or so, he was more interested in screwing Ava Gardner than he was
in singing.

>Ray
>Eberle, Ed Ames, Dick Haymes, Dino, Billy Eckstine, Jack Jones, Sammy Davis,
>Vaughn Monroe, the young Tony Bennett before his pipes turned to leather,
>among others were all far better singers. <snip>

Dick Haymes was probably one of the most underrated male vocalists of
all time. Vaughn Monroe really held his own in the late '40s (he was
EVERYWHERE on radio) but there's only so much you can do with a
baritone in pop music...but a great set of pipes and a superior
talent.

>As is always the case, I have no
>doubt there were legions of unheralded coulda-beens that never garnered
>great fame who were also better. Sinatra had at best a passable timbre
>without much power when he was very young and when that was gone, he had
>nothing left but mob connections, good marketing, hype and excellent bands
>full of musicians he was mostly qualified to serve coffee to, to keep his
>name alive. <snip>

Sinatra always had a weak voice...no power, limited range...Sammy
could sing rings around him in the rat pack days. What he DID have
was 1.) interpretive ability, which someone like a Vaughn Monroe
completely lacked, 2.) a very unusual timbre that emerged making his
voice, as weak as it was, instantly recognizable (as was Crosby's),
and as you said, 3.) Lucky Luciano and his pals. The Feebs under
Hoover tried desperately to indict Sinatra and amassed the biggest FBI
file ever kept on an entertainer http://foia.fbi.gov/sinatra.htm , but
Sinatra wisely had friends in very high places, like JFK and later,
Ronnie RayGun, himself a crook.

You have to look at Sinatra as an entire package, not just as a
vocalist. Public fascination with the mob, the glitter of Vegas and
his self-described "ring-a-ding" attitude all combined to offset his
vocal failings. I have to agree that anything he did after "Come Fly
With Me" in '57 was pretty marginal, altough I must admit I listen to
these albums probably more to hear the likes of Billy May, Nelson
Riddle (a genius with a score), Don Costa and others...those were some
SUPERB charts played by some SUPERB guys, and as well engineered as
any recordings ever have been...thus, propping Sinatra up all the
more.
>
>Well, let me modify that. I do think he had talent as an actor. I enjoy him
>far more in movies than as a singer. <snip>

Like I said, Sinatra was a total package...he could "sorta sing," but
it wasn't the vocal quality, it was the same interpretive abilities
probably brought about by his life's experience that made him a
powerful figure in the mind of the public. It was that same
experience that gave him such powerful credibility as an actor.

dB
 

Doc

Distinguished
Jan 11, 2003
131
0
18,630
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"DeserTBoB" <desertb@rglobal.net> wrote in message
news:q6v5t0d5foklf1j9a9395p4efndjcopk8j@4ax.com...

Excellent post, interesting background stuff.

> The movie supposedly didn't play well in the South (hmmmm...those
> pesky red states again!) and also angered many WW II and Korean War
> vets, knowing that Sinatra had dodged the bullet in WW II and had a
> pretty cushy life on the home front...sort of like our current
> president!

Bob Hope apparently conned his way into avoiding a similar label with his
USO touring. His being "too old" was a somewhat weak excuse. I looked into
this a while back. If he had been just one year younger he would have been
legally required to register for the draft. He was a former boxer and avid
golfer, certainly seemed physically fit enough. If he had genuinely wanted
to pull some strings and get in, I imagine he could have. Jimmy Stewart who
was only about 4 years younger than Hope was labeled 4-F and told to hit the
road because of his weight, but said "screw that", gained weight and saw
combat as a bomber pilot. Accounts I've seen indicated he was an excellent
airman and officer. I imagine he was motivated by machismo as much as by
patriotism, not wanting to be remembered as having been too scrawny for
military duty. No doubt it didn't hurt his career in the long run to have
stepped up to the plate like that when he didn't have to.

> The prejudice angle had been played to the hilt a year
> earlier in '57 with "Sayonara" and seemed to play universally well,
> probably because it didn't involve a black player.

Somewhat humorous that though it was about a white woman who had married a
black man, they managed to go through the whole flick without a black face
ever being shown.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Robin Chandler" <slinky_silkworm@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:silus0ptvcoet1ebnhei25m0j2dts03dm0@4ax.com...

> Whoever told Gloria Estefan she could sing?

Isn't that great at giving bj's either...

> Great band though!

They agree with me...
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

In article <km9Bd.4273$JC2.3969@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> brassplyer@nospamyahoo.com writes:

> > Whoever told Gloria Estefan she could sing?
>
> Isn't that great at giving bj's either...

And just how do you know this?

--
I'm really Mike Rivers (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

"Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
news:znr1104497782k@trad...
>
> In article <km9Bd.4273$JC2.3969@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
brassplyer@nospamyahoo.com writes:
>
> > > Whoever told Gloria Estefan she could sing?
> >
> > Isn't that great at giving bj's either...
>
> And just how do you know this?

Um, that of course being the point of the joke...

Actually I think she has a nice voice. Not my absolute favorite but on some
things she really shines. One of my complaints is that while she's done some
great tunes, she's also done a number of weaker tunes with these wandering,
scalar, painfully uninspired melodies.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 22:08:38 GMT, "HiC" <brassplyer@nospamyahoo.com>
wrote:

>Actually I think she has a nice voice. Not my absolute favorite but on some
>things she really shines. One of my complaints is that while she's done some
>great tunes, she's also done a number of weaker tunes with these wandering,
>scalar, painfully uninspired melodies. <snip>

Eh....J-Lo's got a bigger ass, though.

dB
 

Similar threads