I know a lot of people are miffed a bit about the specs, but I think it's the right move by the phone manufacturers. People do want more powerful chips, don't get me wrong, but the battery life on these things is nowhere close to where they need to be. By showing the chip manufacturers that they're going to opt for the lower chips for battery life, they show them that CPU juice isn't the only factor in these phones.. eventually, the power in those chips will be enough that you'll basically be able to handle anything the apps can throw at it... but being able to go 3 days without having to charge your phone instead of every day or less without using airplane mode, turning off features, and/or refraining from turning on the screen to save battery life. As mentioned, Nokia caters more to a broad spectrum of users, and those are the people who are more concerned with style and convenience, than power specs and features... plus, i don't know much about Windows Phone OS, since I switched to Android after WinMo 6.1, but maybe you don't need dual cores for a smooth experience on WinPhone... regardless, true progress and innovation is made when people stop buying subpar products and force manufacturers to give them more, by raising the lower bars of technology. Cars were expensive toys for rich people until the likes of Ford started rolling out affordable model-T's that the common man could afford. Many people didn't upgrade from dial up internet access to broadband until there were $20 plans and such.. and there was a time where consumers demanded unlimited minutes, texts, and net access and received it... now people have begun just accepting whatever the hell the cell companies "let" them have again and they're taking away unlimited plans and charging $500 for phones that offer less in some departments than older phones, specifically, battery life. Remember everyone, you vote with your wallet..