Parents Pull Girl's Tooth, Scares Cat With RC Car

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]michaelahess[/nom]Gotta show my son this. Maybe I'll use my Summit to yank his latest loose tooth. Or perhaps I should go with one of my nitro's, the Savage sounds appropriate for this situation.....To ta152h, move back to California (or stay there) we don't need your naive views on this. I run my trucks around all my animals, the dogs can't figure out if they should attack them or run away from them, but they get exicted and exersised at the same time. My cat actually plays with them (even the nitros) and has a ball with it.[/citation]

You're clearly a buffoon. That's a different scenario, where a dog likes to play with them. But when you jump a vehicle at over a cat at high speeds, you're just terrifying it. Moving it towards it in a playful manner if the animals enjoys it is totally different.

Did I really have to explain that to you? Maybe you should move back to California. You sound like you're from New Jersey.
 
Playful manor? More like 30mph! They learn to get out of the way after the first one or two hits, have yet to break anything on the dogs, just the trucks 😉

And I scare the hell out of my wifes cat, it's the nastiest animal ever, and that was before I even met the animal, cats are evil!!!!!

Damn thing won't stop sleeping on my lap either, must be traumatized or something, maybe from all those scares.
 
"...a tooth that was not so much loose as it was the last man left standing."

Your baby teeth were male?
 
[citation][nom]maleteeth[/nom]"...a tooth that was not so much loose as it was the last man left standing."Your baby teeth were male?[/citation]

Yep. Testicles and everything.
 
[citation][nom]ta152h[/nom]The scariest part of this video is people so stupid are allowed to breed.Also, scaring the cat isn't particularly something you'd want to teach kids, or even do. If you have animals so you can amuse yourself at your expense, you probably don't deserve them.[/citation]
PETA Hitler is obvious.
 
The title made me think they tied the tooth to the cat and then scared the cat with the RC Car..

Oh well, funny none the less :)
 
Actually... This is quite good - look at the top nav breadcrumb...

Tom's Guide > News and Reviews > All News > News Influence of Technology on Society > Parents Pull Girl's Tooth, Scares Cat With RC Car > Cat's trauma after almost getting hit by a RC Car > Animal Counseling > Jobs > Recession > World > Space > Aliens > BOLLOCKS
 
[citation][nom]ta152h[/nom]Certainly you're not saying that it's OK to abuse cats because they are superior to dogs in responding to it. Dressing a cat up in clothing is different from deliberately scaring the Hell out of it. Cats have emotions, just as dogs do. And for that matter, humans. Pets depend on us, and trust us. You betray that trust when you deliberately do something negative to them for your amusement. A peer is different, but when something depends on you and trust you, you have a responsibility to it to look out for its interests and not amuse yourself at its expense. That cat will survive, of course, that's not the point. A dog would too. The point is you're teaching a child they can do what they want to animals that trust them, and the family, for amusement. Betrayal is never right. It's wrong.[/citation]That cat hasn't suffered significantly having that happen to it. The vacuum cleaner is likely more traumatic for the cat, and likely it is run regularly. I do basically agree with your original post, but the dividing line isn't at the RC car jumping it...it's a little further down the line.

Also, in reference to the original post, very cute...only really tech news via rationalization, but it was fun and cute so cool.
 
I think it's fake. I think here tooth was already out. Anyways, it's sad to see that these people were allowed to breed. Why this is on Tom's, I'll never know.
 
@Jane:

Ever wondered if its possible for someone to post a reply to your articles/blurbs without trying to come on to you? I'm thinking of soo-nah-mee's post on page one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.