Archived from groups: comp.sys.laptops (
More info?)
"MH" <removemstthiscrow5429spam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4RQBc.13795$Wr.7849@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Dan Koren" <dankoren@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:40d7c0aa$1@news.meer.net...
> > "MH" <removemstthiscrow5429spam@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:E7NBc.9724$w07.8623@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > I know that parity/ECC isn't implemented in laptops (as far as I know)
> due
> > > to energy consumption concerns, but has anyone ever released an x86
> based
> > > laptop that used either parity or ECC? What about SPARC, m68k,
PowerPC,
> > or
> > > anyone else? Does anyone manufacture notebook memory that is parity
or
> > ECC
> > > capable? Thanks.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ECC memory is not used in laptops, and in
> > fact not even in most PC's. Only one of the
> > popular mass market chip sets supports ECC,
> > that is the Intel 875. AFAIK none of the
> > mobile chip sets support it.
> >
> > Keep in mind that it is not sufficient for
> > the memory to be designed/configured for
> > parity/ECC -- the memory controller chip
> > must support it too.
> >
>
> Well, the 440BX chipset, used in both desktops
> and portables, was ECC capable.
I certainly know that -- this reply is being
typed on a 440BX desktop! ;-)
> Whether the feature was ever enabled in
> portables, I don't think so.
Not that I know of.
> Shame on Intel though, for not releasing
> more ECC capable desktop chipsets.
One is enough at any given time (currently
the 875). And the fact remains that most
desktops are not built/configured to use
ECC memory. I suppose the assumption is
that only mission critical production
applications justify using ECC, and
those will not be hosted on desktop
PC's.
dk