This is so wrong in many ways. [citation][nom]stm1185[/nom]I dont really like these types of lawsuits, but at least here the company suing is actual creating a similar product. My problem with it is if the patent is just a vague idea, or if its more technical and Spotify copied their setup for streaming.I also think Spotify might be sleezy. They say invite only but I went to the site and put in my email and got a reply right away. The quickness and ease of getting the invite makes me wonder if its all just a PR scheme. Make it seem more exclusive so the users feel special when they get that invite.Its pretty nice though, decent selection of music. Complements Pandora very nicely. If I know exactly what I want to listen to, I use spotify, if I dont I use Pandora. Either way I am not paying a cent for music now.[/citation]
The company suing are creating a similar product? Not a chanse. They are just holding a vauge patent. They are tryingt o boot spotify off the market in the US. That just screams broken god damn patent system. They should completly revamp it to only apply to physical non electronic components. It should never applie to any kind of software, service or abstract things. And it should be given to the inventor given that he can present a physical object.