Playboy's Website Without Boobs is Safe for Work

[JMcEntegart]

How many guys actually claim to only read PlayBoy for the articles? Enough to warrant a 'safe for work' site without any of those pesky pictures, it seems.

Playboy's Website Without Boobs is Safe for Work : Read more

 

[Snipergod87]

Now we have a new site to block on our firewall

 

[alchemy69]

No boobs? So Heffner appears nowhere in it?

 

[nforce4max]

No boobs = no fun

 

[RustyXshackleford]

Hah! read. Sorry Hef, the net destroyed you years ago. Anyway, if you`re interested in the articles, then by all means go to the site. Lots of great people have written articles for playboy, unfortunately that niche of readership no longer exists.

 

[eyemaster]

What do the articles usually talk about anyway? For porn, I prefer hustler anyways.

 

[Franklin Hennersdorfer]

Who needs Hefner, or Playboy? We have the Internet now. And we all know the Interwebs are built on top of Al Gore's porn collection. Now, the nooks and crannies of the Net are chock full o' Porn, ads, porn, Toms Hardware, and...oh yeah, porn.

 

[rooket]

Playboy is really softcore, I can't understand how they make money. But porn is way overdone these days anyway. Playboy some people will argue with me is "Art" well I lately prefer to just see women for who they are. I guess it comes with age and maturity. They'd make more money if they lowered the legal age to buy these to 16 though.

Also Hefner doesn't impress me a slight bit.

 

[bv90andy]

You can always block pictures in many browsers... at least that's what I remember

 

[rtfm]

With all the free porn floating around on the internet, I'm surprised Playboy hasn't gone bust yet.

 

[mactruck]

[citation][nom]bv90andy[/nom]You can always block pictures in many browsers... at least that's what I remember[/citation]

I block pictures when I surf at work, but IT still has access to your HTTP traffic. If they see anybody pulling pages from Playboy.com they won't check your browser settings before calling you in for a long talk about appropriate use of company resources.

 

[jerreece]

Smut.

Anyhow, I'm pretty sure I'd still get into hot water if I were viewing this site at work.

 

[Guest]

Awesome. No more need to clear history

 

[anamaniac]

That's actually pretty cool.
UMM and FHM are decent reading material, playboy is somewhat boring.

 

[HalJordan]

Isn't that like caranddriver.com without pictures of cars? Foodnetwork.com with recipes? The list goes on...

 

[lamorpa]

Um, criticize Heffer all you want, but seriously, he got more supermodel level 'tail' in any one month of his life than any of us even see in a lifetime.

 

[Clintonio]

I don't 'get' Playboy.

Admitted, I don't think many of us see the point anymore.

 

[mavroxur]

It's like Tuan's posts without the Apple propaganda.

 

[sliem]

If you want porn, you go to sublimedirectory or madthumbs.
Not playboy...

If you want to get fired, you visit these sites (even "safe without boobs" ones) while you are at work.

 

[h83r]

Anyone who is bashing Hugh Heffner is not a real man.