G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (More info?)
In article <coih99$564$1@news1.chem.utoronto.ca>,
Rob Reedijk <reedijk@hera.med.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>Richard Crowley <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:
>> "Rob Reedijk" wrote ...
>>> I would also think that it is difficult to create these things since
>>> the body is what conducts the ground and it limits the type of pads
>>> that can be designed. And no matter what, you will have trouble with
>>> how the shunt resistor connects to the body in the pad.
>
>> All the pads I've seen are simply a single capacitor in
>> series with the signal path. No connection to the shell.
>
>Like I said, I am not an EE! I have seen Frank Vuotto's web photos of
>the pad which confirms what you said.
>
>But you still have an extra coupling on the ground path. And this ground
>path is a weakness in the design.
Sure, but there are so many other things wrong with it that the issue is
fairly academic.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
In article <coih99$564$1@news1.chem.utoronto.ca>,
Rob Reedijk <reedijk@hera.med.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>Richard Crowley <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote:
>> "Rob Reedijk" wrote ...
>>> I would also think that it is difficult to create these things since
>>> the body is what conducts the ground and it limits the type of pads
>>> that can be designed. And no matter what, you will have trouble with
>>> how the shunt resistor connects to the body in the pad.
>
>> All the pads I've seen are simply a single capacitor in
>> series with the signal path. No connection to the shell.
>
>Like I said, I am not an EE! I have seen Frank Vuotto's web photos of
>the pad which confirms what you said.
>
>But you still have an extra coupling on the ground path. And this ground
>path is a weakness in the design.
Sure, but there are so many other things wrong with it that the issue is
fairly academic.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."