My open question is how useful this would be to the semiconductor industry: when I read about "self-healing electronics," my first impulse is to think how it'd be useful for spacecraft, which is one environment where parts failure is of utmost concern. Because of this, most spacecraft computers are positively outdated by enthusiast standards. As a comparison, in spite of being launched in 2016, the New Horizons probe sent to Pluto runs off a MIPS r3000 CPU... About comparable to what the original Playstation used. (and, in fact, running slower) Similarly, the Mars Science Laboratory rover recently launched uses a PowerPC 750-based CPU comparable... To an underclocked GameCube. (it runs at around 200 MHz, vs. 485 MHz for the GCN)
In short: probes rely on CPUs slower than comparable designs that debuted 9 years beforehand. Most of this is because of the concerns over developing an existing design to make it radiation-hardened, but if the same sort of durability against deep-space damage could be assured more easily, our probes could start using more up-to-date designs.
Now, this sort of idea of self-healing circuits sounds great for this application... But the question her is of scale: the microcapsules likely have to be vastly smaller than the circuit in question in order to work, but with semiconductors, the scale is already so small, that making the microcapsules small enough to fit may be impossible, especially given our modern circuits are reaching the point where they're starting to be under 50 atoms wide.
[citation][nom]groveborn[/nom]Adamantium is Latin for diamond. Diamonds aren't conductive unless they've been doped.[/citation]
Carbon *IS* a semiconductor, after all... Just like silicon. (which, likewise, is doped to fabricate circuits)