"With the legitimate phone coming and the disappearance of the person selling it, us doing the experiment would basically be a tacit endorsement of such modification. At this point, that didn't seem judicious."
Apparently, faster CPUs were available shortly after you overclocked CPUs. Was doing that experiment thus non-judicious, and why the tacit approval of such modifications then, but not with an iPhone 4? I'm not sure if you're afraid of breaking your precious 'phone more than Apple, or the other way around. But it's clearly one or the other, and neither are exactly impressive credentials for an independent tech site.
Apparently, faster CPUs were available shortly after you overclocked CPUs. Was doing that experiment thus non-judicious, and why the tacit approval of such modifications then, but not with an iPhone 4? I'm not sure if you're afraid of breaking your precious 'phone more than Apple, or the other way around. But it's clearly one or the other, and neither are exactly impressive credentials for an independent tech site.