Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (
More info?)
There is no pending change-over to total HD. There is a pending change over
to total digital (from analog). Some digital broadcasts will be in standard
definition resolution and some will be in high definition. Not all
broadcasts will be in wide screen.
You are probably already well aware of this fact, but a lot of people are
not. This includes the television salesman that I spoke with at Sears the
other day.
"Art" <plotsligt@comcast.net> wrote in message
news
😛bOdnUhsreFJo-3fRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> With the pending change-over to total HD in the near future [07-08] it is
> very doubtful that any cable company will invest in improving the standard
> or analog signal qualities. Does not make economical sense for them. <
> >As noted, split the cable, run the HD and pay per view, etc through the
> >box. Run the standard through the set's onboard tuner. For some reason
the
> >double and triple converting of the standard broadcast signals within the
> >catv boxes also induces many artifacts and noise.
> "Eddie Yasi" <karmaoryx-news@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uKCdnRqpzvFAre3fRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
> > <_cygnusx-1_@excite.com> wrote in message
> > news:1114637909.306768.63150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> Improve the video quality of AD and SD channels? I don't understand how
> >> Comcast's HD content looks as good if not better than DirecTV but the
> >> AD and SD content look much worse.
> >>
> >> Cygnus
> >> The Bringer of Balance
> >>
> >
> > Our Analog channels are mediocre at best, but oddly enough I find our SD
> > channels to be as good, if not a touch better, than DirecTVs. Guess
we're
> > just lucky....
> >
> > Lots of people over at AVSforums have been talking about their starting
to
> > replace AD channels with their SD equivalent. If eventually they do
this
> > for most of their AD channels (especially Sci-Fi channel!!) then I'll be
> > happy.
> >
> > -Eddie
> >
>
>