6230 or 6610i?

[Danny]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Ok, a few questions regarding these 2 if you'll indulge me.

1: I'm wanting to be able to store many, many text messages. Preferably more
than 150. Which, if either, of these would do this?

2: I have found both on PAYG, which is the system I'd get - but I'll have to
unlock so it'll work with my Virgin sim (Both are O2 presently). Would
unlocking software (Nokia Free Unlock Codes Calculator or DCT4 Calculator)
guarantee I can unlock them?

3: I need to be able to type big messages, 2 or 3 texts or more in length.
My 3310 clogs down appallingly the further into the message I get, getting
ridiculously slow and unresponsive and sometimes misregistering a press of
the delete button which was intended for a single letter but which instead
wiped the whole message. Are these 2 phones more efficient for texting?

Cheers.

--
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like
administering medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine

 

[munch]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:01:07 +0100, "Danny"
<notmyemailaddress@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Ok, a few questions regarding these 2 if you'll indulge me.
>
>1: I'm wanting to be able to store many, many text messages. Preferably more
>than 150. Which, if either, of these would do this?

I believe the 6230 has more memory, but Nokia's web site will confirm
that. www.nokia.com

>
>2: I have found both on PAYG, which is the system I'd get - but I'll have to
>unlock so it'll work with my Virgin sim (Both are O2 presently). Would
>unlocking software (Nokia Free Unlock Codes Calculator or DCT4 Calculator)
>guarantee I can unlock them?

Unlock either with this site for free:
http/www.trycktill.com/eng/

>
>3: I need to be able to type big messages, 2 or 3 texts or more in length.
>My 3310 clogs down appallingly the further into the message I get, getting
>ridiculously slow and unresponsive and sometimes misregistering a press of
>the delete button which was intended for a single letter but which instead
>wiped the whole message. Are these 2 phones more efficient for texting?

Don't think I've ever sent one that long from my 6230, but I doubt
either will have a problem... The 6230 is a much better phone, and
worth the higher cost IMHO...
--
Munch

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

"Danny" <notmyemailaddress@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2thm34F1vspifU1@uni-berlin.de:

> Ok, a few questions regarding these 2 if you'll indulge me.
>
> 3: I need to be able to type big messages, 2 or 3 texts or more in
> length. My 3310 clogs down appallingly the further into the message I
> get, getting ridiculously slow and unresponsive and sometimes
> misregistering a press of the delete button which was intended for a
> single letter but which instead wiped the whole message. Are these 2
> phones more efficient for texting?
>
> Cheers.
>

The 6230 is a faster phone than the 6610/i. And four years ahead in R&D
from the 3310.


--
sA

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Err you know on the 3310 the text length limit is 3?? well I was trying
out the txting on my 6230 for you and i thought the message length was 3
but when i got to 1/3 as in 1 character left on the 3rd txt the count
changed to 149/4 then after entering some more mumbo jumbo 149/5 and its
still going and no lag yet!! Anyone know how many txts can be joined on
the 6230??


Lee

 

[Danny]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Bales1983 (Lee Bales)" <"lee"@bales2003.free\"removethis\ wrote:
> Err you know on the 3310 the text length limit is 3?? well I was
> trying out the txting on my 6230 for you and i thought the message
> length was 3 but when i got to 1/3 as in 1 character left on the 3rd
> txt the count changed to 149/4 then after entering some more mumbo
> jumbo 149/5 and its still going and no lag yet!! Anyone know how many
> txts can be joined on the 6230??

6

--
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like
administering medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine

 

[Danny]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

southpawArcher wrote:
> "Danny" <notmyemailaddress@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:2thm34F1vspifU1@uni-berlin.de:
>
>> Ok, a few questions regarding these 2 if you'll indulge me.
>>
>> 3: I need to be able to type big messages, 2 or 3 texts or more in
>> length. My 3310 clogs down appallingly the further into the message I
>> get, getting ridiculously slow and unresponsive and sometimes
>> misregistering a press of the delete button which was intended for a
>> single letter but which instead wiped the whole message. Are these 2
>> phones more efficient for texting?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>
> The 6230 is a faster phone than the 6610/i. And four years ahead in
> R&D from the 3310.

Well my wallet plumped for the 6610i. If it's rank I'll return it and get
the 6230.
Thanks to all who replied.

--
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like
administering medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine

 

[Danny]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Munch wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:01:07 +0100, "Danny"
> <notmyemailaddress@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, a few questions regarding these 2 if you'll indulge me.
>>
>> 1: I'm wanting to be able to store many, many text messages.
>> Preferably more than 150. Which, if either, of these would do this?
>
> I believe the 6230 has more memory, but Nokia's web site will confirm
> that. www.nokia.com

Both hold 150.

>
>>
>> 2: I have found both on PAYG, which is the system I'd get - but I'll
>> have to unlock so it'll work with my Virgin sim (Both are O2
>> presently). Would unlocking software (Nokia Free Unlock Codes
>> Calculator or DCT4 Calculator) guarantee I can unlock them?
>
> Unlock either with this site for free:
> http/www.trycktill.com/eng/

Cheers for that.

>
>>
>> 3: I need to be able to type big messages, 2 or 3 texts or more in
>> length. My 3310 clogs down appallingly the further into the message
>> I get, getting ridiculously slow and unresponsive and sometimes
>> misregistering a press of the delete button which was intended for a
>> single letter but which instead wiped the whole message. Are these 2
>> phones more efficient for texting?
>
> Don't think I've ever sent one that long from my 6230, but I doubt
> either will have a problem... The 6230 is a much better phone, and
> worth the higher cost IMHO...

Well I went for the lesser cost and fingers crossed it's a good choice. If
not good old returns will be called into action.
Thanks.

--
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like
administering medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

Why not send text as a Multi Media message? LOADS of characters available,
and I think you will find it cheaper than 12p/text

Cheers

(Oh, I of course appreciate you were carrying out some text testing to see
how many you can group together)


"Bales1983 (Lee Bales)" <"lee"@bales2003.free\"removethis\"serve.co.uk>
wrote in message news:cl2p2l$rjb$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Err you know on the 3310 the text length limit is 3?? well I was trying
> out the txting on my 6230 for you and i thought the message length was 3
> but when i got to 1/3 as in 1 character left on the 3rd txt the count
> changed to 149/4 then after entering some more mumbo jumbo 149/5 and its
> still going and no lag yet!! Anyone know how many txts can be joined on
> the 6230??
>
>
> Lee

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.nokia (More info?)

"Danny" <notmyemailaddress@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2tl0n6F2041nbU1@uni-berlin.de:

> southpawArcher wrote:
>>
>> The 6230 is a faster phone than the 6610/i. And four years ahead in
>> R&D from the 3310.
>
> Well my wallet plumped for the 6610i. If it's rank I'll return it and
> get the 6230.
> Thanks to all who replied.
>

No probs. Although cheaper, you might, as I was, be disappointed with
flickery keypad and the poorer screen on the 6610(i). Not a bad-looking
phone though.


--
sA