"[Activision's] purpose is not only to cancel Brutal Legend, but to kill it completely so that Guitar Hero would not have to face the competition," the lawsuit claims."
if the judge doesn't, for any other reason, refuse Activision's lawsuit for this statement, which to me, sounds like somebody is trying to monopolize the gaming industry by not allowing competition (yay for America promoting communism giving every kid a trophy for last place instead of teaching them that life isn't all about cookies and icecream) then this judge needs to be sued himself for not only allowing such a stupid lawsuit to go forth, but for allowing activision to control even more of the market. i think i might sue him for being a dumbass if this ends on activisions side.
now if activision still owns the game, then thats a different story, but to give such an asinine reason for this, is just f*cking insulting to America, land of "i can sue for whatever i want and win millions because im lazy and dont want to work"