Amd 2200 at 2.360ghz but not aired cooled

[eden]

Why, is a 2.6GHZ Tbred not gonna beat a 2.6GHZ P4? That's all I meant really...

--
Intel and AMD sitting under a tree, P-R-O-C-E-S-S-I-N-G!

 

[FatBurger]

If the 2.6 Athlon and the 2.6 P4 are the highest processors from each company at the time, then that might make a difference.

<font color=blue>Hi mom!</font color=blue>

 

[eden]

Yes and it is what I meant, with current competing processors, a OCed 2.6GHZ Tbred would be a great money saver, except that it lacks SSE, and is on extreme cooling. My main point was that its performance at such speed, with a high bus as well, kicks ass for sure. I wonder if SSE2 apps like After Effects would still shine on the P4 at the same clock speed. I am guessing yes, since there is added bus and RAM since the 2.4GHZ.

--
Intel and AMD sitting under a tree, P-R-O-C-E-S-S-I-N-G!

 

[lhgpoobaa]

looks promising for the future of the tbred.
this cpu is using the newer G stepping too.
just you wait.
we will see 2.5ghz air cooled sooner or later,
proly around the time barton shows up.

<font color=green>Proud member of THG's</font color=green> <font color=blue>Den Of Thieves</font color=blue> :lol:

 

[juin]

If barton will show up at the same time still be a barton 2500 GHZ.

cheap, cheap. Think cheap, and you'll always be cheap.AMD version of semi conducteur industrie

 

[Quetzacoatl]

Do you think that the G stepping T-breds are synonymous to the AXP AXIA stettings? It would still seem to me that AMD needs to improve their .13 yields before they even consider releasing Barton, otherwise, it's nothing more than an advanced T-bred with extra cache. Who knows, an 1800+ Barton may be the 1.6a from AMD

"When there's a will, there's a way."

 

[lhgpoobaa]

no, i wouldnt call it an axia of the tbred world... but it is a definate improvment.


<font color=green>Proud member of THG's</font color=green> <font color=blue>Den Of Thieves</font color=blue> :lol:

 

[Matisaro]

Who knows, an 1800+ Barton may be the 1.6a from AMD

The 1800 tbird is the 1.6a from amd, taking that sucker to 2300+ is nothing to scoff at, and on a 166fsb would give the 2.4 p4 a run for its money.

The Cash Left In My Pocket,The BEST Benchmark

 

[lhgpoobaa]

hehehe
i assume you mean tbred not tb<font color=red>i</font color=red>d
LOL

tbird at 2.3Ghz... hmmm... little fusion generator lol

<font color=green>Proud member of THG's</font color=green> <font color=blue>Den Of Thieves</font color=blue> :lol:

 

[FatBurger]

a OCed 2.6GHZ Tbred would be a great money saver

Because super cooling is cheap.

except that it lacks SSE

I think you mean SSE2.

My main point was that its performance at such speed, with a high bus as well, kicks ass for sure

What, for 10 seconds before it crashes?

<font color=blue>Hi mom!</font color=blue>

 

[chuck232]

I think you mean SSE2.

No I think he meant SSE cause when using LN2 cooling or something like that to do extreme overclocks, it seems like a few lose their SSE.

What's the deal with lampshades, I mean it's a lamp, why would you want a shade?

 

[eden]

Yeah that's what I meant.
As for extreme cooling pricing, I said if the aircooling methods work at 2.6GHZ soon if Tbred continues to improve then the cooling won't be so expensive, but we'll see.

--
Intel and AMD sitting under a tree, P-R-O-C-E-S-S-I-N-G!

 

[FatBurger]

Oh, that's right. I forgot about that little quirk.

<font color=blue>Hi mom!</font color=blue>

 

[Dinski]

I have a friend who keep his PIII Celeron PC in a freezer. It is too overclockable, but probably he will damage both the PC and the freezer.

 

[Era]

Fatburger is right,the end performance does't mean a thing.It's the clock that counts.